Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 50 Issue 10
Article Contents

Citation: Jianxun JI. A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 140-149. shu

A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

  • The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 131-140.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 177-178.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 117-124.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 108-107.

    5. [5]

      . Faded Radical Politics and Plural Urban Society: Rethinking Modernization Studies. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 177-184.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 143-160.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 112-121.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 179-184.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 178-184.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 70-80.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 52-60.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 66-75.

    13. [13]

      Jiang SUN . China’s Turn of Conceptual History Research. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 150-158.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 57-69.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 52-62.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 99-134.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 5-12.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 89-98.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 165-184.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 45-57.

Article Metrics

Article views: 38 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(38)
  • HTML views(18)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

        Abstract: The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return