Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 50 Issue 10
Article Contents

Citation: Shiyi CHEN and Yingtao WU. Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 39-57. shu

Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze

  • Environmental protection tax is a great tool for controlling pollution such as haze. However, the latest environmental taxs’ plan announced in 2018 has been questioned as to whether it can effectively promote local haze pollution control and inter-regional collaborative governance. For this reason, the paper measures the marginal cost of smog control by estimating the shadow prices of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust, which are the main sources of haze, in order to analyze the problems and optimization directions of environmental taxation reform in China. The study found that the shadow price of air pollution emissions in China has continued to increase substantially since 2005, so that the environmental protection tax standard can’t be simply " tax-tax shift” and a stage-by-stage upgrade mechanism should be established.Among them, the nitrogen oxides’ environmental protection tax is relative to sulfur dioxide and Dust and dust are extremely low.And as a focus of future emission reductions, there should be substantial adjustments.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 83-92.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 66-80.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 88-98.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 68-77.

    5. [5]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 88-96.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 66-79.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 81-90.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 88-97.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 103-111.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 67-101.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 96-105.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 74-89.

    13. [13]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 172-173.

Figures(9) / Tables(9)

Article Metrics

Article views: 414 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(2)
  • Abstract views(414)
  • HTML views(26)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze

          • Fudan University School of Economics, Shanghai 200433

          Abstract: Environmental protection tax is a great tool for controlling pollution such as haze. However, the latest environmental taxs’ plan announced in 2018 has been questioned as to whether it can effectively promote local haze pollution control and inter-regional collaborative governance. For this reason, the paper measures the marginal cost of smog control by estimating the shadow prices of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and smoke dust, which are the main sources of haze, in order to analyze the problems and optimization directions of environmental taxation reform in China. The study found that the shadow price of air pollution emissions in China has continued to increase substantially since 2005, so that the environmental protection tax standard can’t be simply " tax-tax shift” and a stage-by-stage upgrade mechanism should be established.Among them, the nitrogen oxides’ environmental protection tax is relative to sulfur dioxide and Dust and dust are extremely low.And as a focus of future emission reductions, there should be substantial adjustments.

            HTML

          Figure (9)  Table (9) Relative (13)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return