语言与基因：论南岛语族的起源与扩散

范志泉; 邓晓华; 王传超

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

December 2018

Article Contents

Citation: Zhiquan FAN, Xiaohua DENG and Chuanchao WANG. Languages and Genes: Comment on the Origin and Dispersal of Austronesian[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 175-184. shu

Languages and Genes: Comment on the Origin and Dispersal of Austronesian

Abstract

The origin and dispersal of Austronesian has always been a controversial issue in the field of linguistics. The correlation between language and gene evolution is one of the research fields of linguistics and molecular Anthropology. Here we reviewed the different hypothesis about the origin and dispersal of Austronesian in historical linguistics in the perspective of theory, methods and materials, and also discussed the limitations of previous researches. On this basis, we put forward a new scenario on the origin and dispersal of Austronesian from the perspective of interdisciplinary cooperation combining the latest results of genetics and molecular anthropology. The ancestors of the Thai-Austronesian population can be traced back to the southern mainland China. Their migration and diffusion toward Taiwan and Southeast Asia had began from 5000—6000. B.P. One branch migrated to Taiwan,via Philippines, the easthern of Indonesia, to the Remote Oceanic, who created the early Lapita culture there; The other branch migrated through the Indo-Sino peninsula, Island Southeast Asia to the easthern Indonesia. Many present-day populations in Southeast Asia are the admixtures of these above two groups with the indigenous populations who speak Papuan languages. The people who stayed in the southern mainland China have developed into the present-day Tai-Kadai related populations and then Tai-Kadai populations mixed with the northern Han Chinese to form southern Han Chinese.
- language,
- genes,
- Austronesian,
- phylogenetic
References
Access
1. [1]
  Zhixiang JIAN , Rong MA . Language, Construction of Nation-state, and Language Policy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 123-147.
2. [2]
  Yu GAO . On Literary Language and the Construction ofContemparary Chinese. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 141-150.
3. [3]
  Rong LI . Roland Barthes and the Language Practice of “the Third Generation Poetry”. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 130-140.
4. [4]
  CHEN Zhuo . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 42-52.
5. [5]
  Guojun XIA . Naturalist and Anti-naturalist Fractals of American Philosophical Holism. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 45-59.
6. [6]
  Jing LIU . Gene Editing and Human Dignity. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 28-37.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 58-62.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 173-175.
9. [9]
  . Economic Thought, Confidence of Way and Historical Evolution (Symposium). Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 45-49.
10. [10]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 112-120.
11. [11]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 54-57.
12. [12]
  Zhixiang JIAN , Rong MA . Human Language and Social Development. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 121-138.
13. [13]
  JIAN Zhixiang . Historical Transition Process of Language Policies in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 123-144.
14. [14]
  Fengyang ZHANG . The Linguistic Approach in the Study of Modernity. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 52-63.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 56-65.
16. [16]
  Shaoqing WEN , Panxin DU . Paleogenomics and Its Application in Human History Research. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 176-188.
17. [17]
  LIN Ka . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 101-109.
18. [18]
  Licheng XU . The Formation and Evolution of the Criticism of “Literati Conduct Immorally” from Han to Six Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 165-174.
19. [19]
  Jinfeng GE , Zhigang YUAN , Xiaoyan FAN . Understanding Globalization: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Co-evolution of Economic-Social-Political System. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 31-44.
20. [20]
  Weisen LI . Rereading Keynes: Evolutionary Formation and Theoretical Criticisms of Keynes’ Economic Theory on Depression. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 72-100.

Figures(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4453 Times PDF downloads: 18 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(18)
Abstract views(4453)
HTML views(919)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Languages and Genes: Comment on the Origin and Dispersal of Austronesian

Available Online: 2018-10-01

Abstract: The origin and dispersal of Austronesian has always been a controversial issue in the field of linguistics. The correlation between language and gene evolution is one of the research fields of linguistics and molecular Anthropology. Here we reviewed the different hypothesis about the origin and dispersal of Austronesian in historical linguistics in the perspective of theory, methods and materials, and also discussed the limitations of previous researches. On this basis, we put forward a new scenario on the origin and dispersal of Austronesian from the perspective of interdisciplinary cooperation combining the latest results of genetics and molecular anthropology. The ancestors of the Thai-Austronesian population can be traced back to the southern mainland China. Their migration and diffusion toward Taiwan and Southeast Asia had began from 5000—6000. B.P. One branch migrated to Taiwan,via Philippines, the easthern of Indonesia, to the Remote Oceanic, who created the early Lapita culture there; The other branch migrated through the Indo-Sino peninsula, Island Southeast Asia to the easthern Indonesia. Many present-day populations in Southeast Asia are the admixtures of these above two groups with the indigenous populations who speak Papuan languages. The people who stayed in the southern mainland China have developed into the present-day Tai-Kadai related populations and then Tai-Kadai populations mixed with the northern Han Chinese to form southern Han Chinese.