民事程序正义的中国图景重绘:目的、体系与时代因应
作者简介:曹志勋,北京大学法学院长聘副教授(北京 100871)。
基金项目:
本文系2024年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“数智时代下民事司法的变革”(24SFB3026)的阶段性成果
摘要: 民事程序正义是现代法治的基本内涵,应当成为指引司法实践与部门法研究的核心理念。虽然程序正义最初源自西方法治传统,在概念视角下仍应当将民事程序正义视为我国程序法治的标识性概念。在外部视角下,民事程序正义的理解取决于民事诉讼应然目的与功能的指引。基于多种可能的理论选择,应建构我国本土知识体系形塑的特色多元诉的目的论。从内部视角来看,在我国重视基本权利保护的宪法实施框架下,民事程序正义具有能与西方法治经验对话的本土理论与制度实践,呈现为多层次的自主程序正义观。在现实导向的视角下,数智时代的司法人工智能应用发展迅速,其对传统民事程序正义的影响有变与不变两种情况。有必要预见人工智能法官的高阶应用,细化对辅助审判原则的理解。
Reconsidering the Chinese Landscape of Procedural Justice in Civil Cases: Procedural Aims,Systematic Framework and the Development in Digital Era
Abstract: Civil procedural justice is deemed as a fundamental aspect of modern rule of law and should serve as one core guiding idea for judicial practice and legal research.Although procedural justice originally stems from Western legal traditions,from a conceptual perspective,civil procedural justice should still be regarded as an iconic concept of China's procedural rule of law.From an external perspective,the understanding of civil procedural justice depends on the guidance of the normative purposes and functions of civil litigation.Based on multiple possible theoretical choices,a distinctive pluralistic procedural teleology,shaped by China's local knowledge system,should be constructed.From an internal perspective,within China's constitutional implementation framework emphasizing fundamental rights protection,civil procedural justice possesses a local theory and institutional practice capable of dialogue with Western rule of law experiences,manifesting as a multi-layered autonomous conception of procedural justice.From a reality-oriented perspective,the application of judicial artificial intelligence in the digital-intelligent era is developing rapidly,and its impact on traditional civil procedural justice presents both changing and unchanging aspects.It is necessary to anticipate the advanced applications of AI judges and refine our understanding of the auxiliary adjudication principle.