Citation:
Rongjun YANG. The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 79-91.
The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace
-
Abstract
In cyberspace, as a complex social phenomenon, populism is a social trend of thought, a political strategy and a social movement as well. Generally speaking, the action logic of populism in cyberspace follows the law of “social trend of thought → political strategy → social movement”, and its process is shown as “public opinion fermenting → public opinion denouncing → public resentment boiling → network mobilization → network spillover”. In current china, the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace is complex. It is the product of the interaction of social, psychological and political factors. To a certain extent, although populism in cyberspace has the social function of warning, it also has the harm of impacting the mainstream ideology, stirring up the social contradictions, destroying the social order and so on. Therefore, in the foundation of paying attention to social justice and people-centered and starting from the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace, we should follow the logic of technology interruption, system construction, identity construction and root cause governance to effectively control its harm.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[2]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[3]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[4]
WANG Gang
. Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 206-216.
-
[5]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[6]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[7]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[8]
XIONG Changkun
, ZHANG Ziyuan
. Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 198-210.
-
[9]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[10]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[11]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad:
