Citation:
Rongjun YANG. The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 79-91.
The Action Logic, Breeding Situation and Governance of Populism in Cyberspace
-
Abstract
In cyberspace, as a complex social phenomenon, populism is a social trend of thought, a political strategy and a social movement as well. Generally speaking, the action logic of populism in cyberspace follows the law of “social trend of thought → political strategy → social movement”, and its process is shown as “public opinion fermenting → public opinion denouncing → public resentment boiling → network mobilization → network spillover”. In current china, the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace is complex. It is the product of the interaction of social, psychological and political factors. To a certain extent, although populism in cyberspace has the social function of warning, it also has the harm of impacting the mainstream ideology, stirring up the social contradictions, destroying the social order and so on. Therefore, in the foundation of paying attention to social justice and people-centered and starting from the breeding situation of populism in cyberspace, we should follow the logic of technology interruption, system construction, identity construction and root cause governance to effectively control its harm.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[2]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[3]
ZHENG Jianghuai
, HAN Lei
. AI Reshaping the National Innovation System: Typical Facts and Their Economic Logic. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 41-52.
-
[4]
DESIKELA Feilipu
. . Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 162-165.
-
[5]
ZOU Shipeng
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 5-11.
-
[6]
ZHANG Wu
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 11-16.
-
[7]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[8]
QI Tao
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 16-21.
-
-