Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 56 Issue 3
March 2024
Article Contents

Citation: HE Qizhi. A Proactive Government in the Digital Era: From the Perspective of Public Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 96-106. shu

A Proactive Government in the Digital Era: From the Perspective of Public Governance

  • From the perspective of governance,the essence of a proactive government is to build a service-oriented government that satisfies the people,which is to continuously improve the government's governance capabilities,give full play to the role of the government,and promote public value creation.Human society is entering the digital age,and promoting digital development requires a proactive government.In the digital age,digital technology not only affects the way of human production and life,but also promotes the reform of government governance.To meet the needs of the people for a better digital life,and to modernize the national governance system and governance capacity,it is inherently necessary to strengthen the construction of a proactive government.That requires the government to implement the people-oriented approach in government reform and innovation,empower and enhance the modernization level of government governance capabilities by digital technology which can reshape the form and model of government governance,and then do a good job in promoting the construction of a good digital ecosystem,improving digital economic governance,and ensuring inclusive supply of digital public services,to enhancing the people's sense of gain,happiness,and security in the digital development.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

    2. [2]

      YANG Lan ,  ZHOU Yahong ,  XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.

    3. [3]

      LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.

    4. [4]

      DI Jinhua ,  XIAO Mingjia . The Production of Flexibility in Local Governments and the Softening of Budgetary Constraints——An Analysis Based on Township-Owned Enterprises in Xixiang. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 147-157.

    5. [5]

      ZHANG Jun ,  FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.

    6. [6]

      XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.

    7. [7]

      LI Ming ,  XU Haiqi ,  XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.

    8. [8]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    9. [9]

      ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

    10. [10]

      SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    11. [11]

      WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

    12. [12]

      FAN Jin . Can World Literature Be Coded——Literary Ideas in an Age of Functional Differentiation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 171-183.

    13. [13]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    14. [14]

      XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

    15. [15]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    16. [16]

      ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.

    17. [17]

      XIONG Changkun ,  ZHANG Ziyuan . Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 198-210.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3210 Times PDF downloads: 14 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(14)
  • Abstract views(3210)
  • HTML views(558)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A Proactive Government in the Digital Era: From the Perspective of Public Governance

        Abstract: From the perspective of governance,the essence of a proactive government is to build a service-oriented government that satisfies the people,which is to continuously improve the government's governance capabilities,give full play to the role of the government,and promote public value creation.Human society is entering the digital age,and promoting digital development requires a proactive government.In the digital age,digital technology not only affects the way of human production and life,but also promotes the reform of government governance.To meet the needs of the people for a better digital life,and to modernize the national governance system and governance capacity,it is inherently necessary to strengthen the construction of a proactive government.That requires the government to implement the people-oriented approach in government reform and innovation,empower and enhance the modernization level of government governance capabilities by digital technology which can reshape the form and model of government governance,and then do a good job in promoting the construction of a good digital ecosystem,improving digital economic governance,and ensuring inclusive supply of digital public services,to enhancing the people's sense of gain,happiness,and security in the digital development.

          HTML

        Relative (17)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return