Citation:
YU Nanping. The Great Power Competition in the Context of Carbon Governance Power[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 93-105.
The Great Power Competition in the Context of Carbon Governance Power
-
Abstract
As an emerging power in the field of global environmental governance,carbon governance power has undergone a complex construction process from social movement to global political consensus to productive power transformation.Classic international relations theories’ research on carbon governance mainly comes from Western ecological Marxism,which can hardly provide an appropriate explanation for carbon governance due to the absence of the application of the global economy analytical framework.As the concept of low-carbon development walks onto the stage,many countries have introduced a series of policies regarding carbon governance and correspondingly promoted political and economic agendas,highlighting the interaction between the construction of carbon governance,a kind of superstructure in international relations,and the transformation of the global economic base.Despite there being space for dialogue and cooperation in terms of carbon governance power,major countries have been competing around rule-formulating,carbon finance,trade standard,low-carbon techniques,and new energy automobile especially.The great power competition,based on the integration of industry and technique,is casting a huge influence on the construction and consolidation of carbon governance power.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
XIONG Changkun
, ZHANG Ziyuan
. Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 198-210.
-
[2]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[3]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[4]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[5]
YANG Lan
, ZHOU Yahong
, XIAO Xinyue
. Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 71-83.
-
[6]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[7]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[8]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[9]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[10]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[11]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[12]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: