论马克思社会政治理论的起点

邹诗鹏

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

September 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Shipeng ZOU. Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30. shu

Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

Shipeng ZOU

School of Philosophy, Fudan University Center for Contemporary Marxism in Foreign Countries of Fudan University

Abstract

Unlike identifying the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as the German Ideology, Doctoral Thesis, or Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this paper identifies the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ and Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction, and On the Jewish Question in the period of German-French Yearbook. In these documents, Marx realized the transition from enlightenment liberalism to radicalism. By following Feuerbach’s subject-predicate inversion logic, Marx reversed Hegel’s “state determines civil society” into “civil society determines the state”. However, Marx did not stop at the ready-made judgment that “civil society determines the state”, but explored the historical sublation of civil society and mapped out the possible forms of the state respectively. Marx’s civil society is obviously not the ready-made egoistic civil society of the young Hegelians and Feuerbach, but as a historically existing bourgeois society, which becomes the object of criticism of political economy in the process of the promotion and transformation of human society, thus achieving the historical materialism. Through the criticism of Hegel’s rational state or ethical state, Marx also tried to realize the transformation from the material or bourgeois state to the people’s state. But the people’s state is different from an anarchist and populist state, but a social community associated with the construction of a new society. The socialization of the state is the basic theoretical orientation that has been given in Marx’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of state and law.
- Marx,
- critique of Hegel’s philosophy of state and law,
- civil society,
- state socialization
References
Access
1. [1]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
2. [2]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
3. [3]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
4. [4]
  XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.
5. [5]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
6. [6]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
7. [7]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
8. [8]
  ZANG Leizhen , LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.
9. [9]
  DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.
10. [10]
  MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.
11. [11]
  WANG Jiajun , ZHENG Ningning . Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 158-169.
12. [12]
  HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.
13. [13]
  GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.
14. [14]
  SHI Dan , LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.
15. [15]
  ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.
16. [16]
  HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4106 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(4)
Abstract views(4106)
HTML views(690)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

Shipeng ZOU

School of Philosophy, Fudan University Center for Contemporary Marxism in Foreign Countries of Fudan University

Available Online: 2021-06-21

Abstract: Unlike identifying the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as the German Ideology, Doctoral Thesis, or Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, this paper identifies the starting point of Marx’s socio-political theory as Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ and Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction, and On the Jewish Question in the period of German-French Yearbook. In these documents, Marx realized the transition from enlightenment liberalism to radicalism. By following Feuerbach’s subject-predicate inversion logic, Marx reversed Hegel’s “state determines civil society” into “civil society determines the state”. However, Marx did not stop at the ready-made judgment that “civil society determines the state”, but explored the historical sublation of civil society and mapped out the possible forms of the state respectively. Marx’s civil society is obviously not the ready-made egoistic civil society of the young Hegelians and Feuerbach, but as a historically existing bourgeois society, which becomes the object of criticism of political economy in the process of the promotion and transformation of human society, thus achieving the historical materialism. Through the criticism of Hegel’s rational state or ethical state, Marx also tried to realize the transformation from the material or bourgeois state to the people’s state. But the people’s state is different from an anarchist and populist state, but a social community associated with the construction of a new society. The socialization of the state is the basic theoretical orientation that has been given in Marx’s critique of Hegel’s philosophy of state and law.

HTML

Relative (16)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization

HTML

目录