Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 50 Issue 10
December 2018
Article Contents

    Citation: Jianxun JI. A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 140-149. shu

    A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

    • Abstract

      The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

      2. [2]

        ZHAO Lin ,  ZHANG Boyu ,  LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

      3. [3]

        LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.

      4. [4]

        LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.

      5. [5]

        SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

      6. [6]

        RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

      7. [7]

        NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

      8. [8]

        WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

      9. [9]

        CHEN Yinchi ,  WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.

      10. [10]

        LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.

      11. [11]

        YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

      12. [12]

        QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.

      13. [13]

        SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

      14. [14]

        WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

      15. [15]

        YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

      16. [16]

        HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

      17. [17]

        LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 5095 Times PDF downloads: 13 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(13)
    • Abstract views(5095)
    • HTML views(659)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature

          • Available Online: 2018-10-01

          Abstract: The discipline of Chinese comparative literature has made great achievements in the past 40 years. However, recently comparative literature in China has a tendency to put influence studies and parallel studies into opposition. This has also objectively led to the often-encountered " mythicization of influence studies” and " demonization of parallel studies” and other negative reactions that undermine the academic credibility of comparative literature. Firstly, combining the history of Western comparative literature with the new trend of domestic comparative literature research, this paper sums up two kinds of bad symptoms accompanied by the development of Chinese comparative literature. Secondly, on the basis of discerning the relationship between influence studies and parallel studies, this paper further discusses several main research types of comparative literature and redefines two important concepts of " comparability” and " knowledge equipment” in comparative literature. Finally, the author tries to look forward to the third stage of global comparative literature. It shows that after 40 years of leap-forward development, compared with the vigorous development of comparative literature teaching and research practice, Chinese scholars in the construction of comparative literature methodology still have a long way to go.

            HTML

          Relative (17)

          目录

          沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

          ICCAS
           Chinese Chemical Society

          Address： 邮政编码：200020

          Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

          Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return