Citation:
WANG Jianmin. How the Empathy is Possible: The Distinction between “Heart to Heart” and “Intersubjective Understanding”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 109-116.
How the Empathy is Possible: The Distinction between “Heart to Heart” and “Intersubjective Understanding”
-
Abstract
Phenomenological sociology expands the view of interpretive sociology with the concepts or methods of “intersubjectivity” and “phenomenological reduction”,which has the significance of correcting the subject-object dualism in scientism.In terms of methodology,there are some similarities between heart-to-heart from the perspective of Confucianism and intersubjective understanding,such as suspending established standards or rules and reaching consensus understanding with perceptual intuition.The differences between the two are mainly reflected in the following aspects: Firstly,intersubjective understanding is derived from the reflexivity of subject-object duality,while heart-to-heart(“将心比心”) is based on the understanding of the internal-external relations between individual and society.Secondly,the “subject” of intersubjective understanding is individual,while the “subject” of heart-to-heart is relational.Thirdly,the intersubjective understanding of facing the other is based on the religious spirit,while heart-to-heart is generated and expanded in daily life.The key of heart-to-heart is the stimulation and extrapolation of self-heart.Identifying the differences between heart-to-heart and intersubjective understanding and their deep presuppositions will help us to understand the emotive logic of Chinese peoples socal actions.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[2]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[3]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[4]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
[5]
ZHANG Jun
, FANG Hongsheng
. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 70-90.
-
[6]
YANG Bo
. An Analysis of the Burial of the Lü Xing in the Chu Region during the Warring States Period. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 195-206.
-
[7]
YOU Yang
. How Does AI Understand Language Meaning. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 16-28.
-
[8]
LIU Chuang
, LIU Sijia
. Conceptual Engineering: A Way of Understanding Mind and Intelligence in the Future. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 11-19.
-
[9]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[10]
WANG Gang
. Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 206-216.
-
[11]
FENG Yurong
. “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 180-190.
-
[12]
GE Yonghai
, PAN Juqiang
. Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 159-173.
-
[13]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[14]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[15]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
-