施特劳斯政治哲学与海德格尔

黄瑞成; 张鑫; 玛赫更里

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Ruicheng HUANG, Xin ZHANG and Gengli MAHE. Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 85-97. shu

Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

Abstract

Leo Strauss probably remains the single most influential and controversial writer of the history of political philosophy. The “enduring importance” of Strauss as a political philosopher does lie in his debates through his academic career with Heidegger, “the first philosopher” of the contemporary West. Today, the controversy surrounding Strauss’s political philosophy has already gone beyond the scope of Western academics and profoundly affected Chinese academics. China has not succumbed and will never “succumb to Western rationalism” as Strauss thinks: Strauss proposes to “begin to understand the possibility of a world religion”, and Heidegger advocates to prepare “for the great moment of the passing of the last god”, but the teaching of the ancient Chinese Sage Confucius is “human beings can promote the Tao, but not the Tao can promote human beings.”
- political philosophy,
- Leo Strauss,
- Martin Heidegger
References
Access
1. [1]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
2. [2]
  GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.
3. [3]
  HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.
4. [4]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.
5. [5]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
6. [6]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.
7. [7]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4947 Times PDF downloads: 3 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(3)
Abstract views(4947)
HTML views(1010)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

Available Online: 2022-06-20

Abstract: Leo Strauss probably remains the single most influential and controversial writer of the history of political philosophy. The “enduring importance” of Strauss as a political philosopher does lie in his debates through his academic career with Heidegger, “the first philosopher” of the contemporary West. Today, the controversy surrounding Strauss’s political philosophy has already gone beyond the scope of Western academics and profoundly affected Chinese academics. China has not succumbed and will never “succumb to Western rationalism” as Strauss thinks: Strauss proposes to “begin to understand the possibility of a world religion”, and Heidegger advocates to prepare “for the great moment of the passing of the last god”, but the teaching of the ancient Chinese Sage Confucius is “human beings can promote the Tao, but not the Tao can promote human beings.”

HTML

Relative (7)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being

HTML

目录