Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 57 Issue 7
August 2025
Article Contents

Citation: GAN Shaoping. Naturalness and Autonomy: The Differentiation of Ethical Norm Generation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 19-30. shu

Naturalness and Autonomy: The Differentiation of Ethical Norm Generation

  • Throughout contemporary bioethics, environmental ethics, ecological ethics and medical ethics, the opposition between the concepts of naturalness and autonomy is like a red line that runs through discussions of almost all topics in these fields. Different understandings of the importance of naturalness and autonomy not only determine the differences between biological conservatives, biological liberals, and transhumanism, as well as the determination of the path for generating ethical norms, but also affect the moral understanding of human nature, life extension, and genetic enhancement. Through these discussions, the inherent strong logical explanatory power and competitiveness of the autonomy principle are clearly presented. While the autonomy principle provides support for people to modify nature and the natural genetic basis of humans, the principles of non-harm and justice determine the limits of such modifications.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      DESIKELA Feilipu . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 162-165.

    2. [2]

      LIN Meimao . What is “World Philosophy” Meant to Do——A Critical Examination of the Exploration of “World Philosophy” in Japanese Academia. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 22-30.

    3. [3]

      WANG Ruosi . Don't know the Law Can Exemption from Criminal Responsibility?——Construction of a Reliance-Protection-Oriented Paradigm for the Theory of Consciousness of Illegality. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 102-115.

    4. [4]

      ZOU Shipeng . The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 5-11.

    5. [5]

      ZHANG Wu . The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 11-16.

    6. [6]

      HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.

    7. [7]

      QI Tao . The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 16-21.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3326 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(3326)
  • HTML views(91)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Naturalness and Autonomy: The Differentiation of Ethical Norm Generation

        Abstract: Throughout contemporary bioethics, environmental ethics, ecological ethics and medical ethics, the opposition between the concepts of naturalness and autonomy is like a red line that runs through discussions of almost all topics in these fields. Different understandings of the importance of naturalness and autonomy not only determine the differences between biological conservatives, biological liberals, and transhumanism, as well as the determination of the path for generating ethical norms, but also affect the moral understanding of human nature, life extension, and genetic enhancement. Through these discussions, the inherent strong logical explanatory power and competitiveness of the autonomy principle are clearly presented. While the autonomy principle provides support for people to modify nature and the natural genetic basis of humans, the principles of non-harm and justice determine the limits of such modifications.

          HTML

        Relative (7)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return