Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 8
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Peng ZHAO and Yaowen XIE. The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104. shu

The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization

  • The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    2. [2]

      YANG Dian ,  DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.

    3. [3]

      SHI Dan ,  LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.

    4. [4]

      XIONG Changkun ,  ZHANG Ziyuan . Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 198-210.

    5. [5]

      XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.

    6. [6]

      ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

    7. [7]

      HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

    8. [8]

      SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    9. [9]

      XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

    10. [10]

      ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.

    11. [11]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    12. [12]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    13. [13]

      ZANG Leizhen ,  LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.

    14. [14]

      MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.

    15. [15]

      XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.

    16. [16]

      QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.

    17. [17]

      ZHANG Jun ,  FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.

    18. [18]

      CHEN Yinchi ,  WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.

    19. [19]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    20. [20]

      YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

Article Metrics

Article views: 4481 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(4481)
  • HTML views(443)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization

        Abstract: The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return