Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 54 Issue 8
November 2022
Article Contents

    Citation: Peng ZHAO and Yaowen XIE. The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104. shu

    The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization

    • Abstract

      The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

      2. [2]

        YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

      3. [3]

        CHEN Yinchi ,  WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.

      4. [4]

        YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

      5. [5]

        QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.

      6. [6]

        SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

      7. [7]

        ZHAO Lin ,  ZHANG Boyu ,  LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

      8. [8]

        LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.

      9. [9]

        RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 4321 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(0)
    • Abstract views(4321)
    • HTML views(395)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization

          • Available Online: 2022-08-20

          Abstract: The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.

            HTML

          Relative (9)

          目录

          沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

          ICCAS
           Chinese Chemical Society

          Address： 邮政编码：200020

          Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

          Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return