Citation:
Peng ZHAO and Yaowen XIE. The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization
-
Abstract
The governance system of the science and technology has changed from focusing on “physical impact” to “value impact”, which has triggered an ethical governance shift. At present, the ethical governance structure of science and technology is far from mature. The normative basis of ethical governance of science and technology, the relationship between ethics of science and technology and law, and the way in which law intervenes in ethical governance need to be clarified. The normative basis for the development of ethical governance is that, with the evolution of the “science-technology-society” relationship, the law should not simply understand science and technology as a neutral tool but need to face up to its value-loaded attributes. The development of new and emerging science and technology requires appropriate legal intervention to establish an orderly reflection process and form behavioral guidelines, which ultimately promotes the orderly dialogue and connection between the science-technology system and the social system. The specific path includes institutionalizing ethical deliberation procedures, improving the multi-level behavior guidance system, and constructing a self-regulatory system which is subjected to the state regulation.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[2]
ZHAO Dingxin
. Sapiensity and the Problem of Acceleration: Toward a New Ontological Framework for Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 116-131.
-
[3]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[4]
ZHANG Wu
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 11-16.
-
[5]
DESIKELA Feilipu
. . Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 162-165.
-
[6]
QI Tao
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 16-21.
-
[7]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
[8]
ZOU Shipeng
. The Thoughtful Depth of the Contemporary Marxist Philosophy Research (Symposium). Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 5-11.
-
[9]
YIN Desheng
, WANG Han
. Optimization-Driven Artificial Intelligence Finance: A Paradigm Shift and Technological Reconfiguration. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 53-66.
-
[10]
WANG Mingming
. Marcel Granet,Chinese Thought and Anthropology: Conversation in Paris. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 155-162.
-
[11]
LI Xiuyun
, LI Yue
. Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 206-216.
-
[12]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: