Citation:
LI Shengchuan. Continent Philosophy and Critical Theory Turn of Contemporary American Literary Theory[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(9): 169-177.
Continent Philosophy and Critical Theory Turn of Contemporary American Literary Theory
-
Abstract
Around the 1960s, New Criticism encountered development bottlenecks in the United States, and the philosophical trends originated from the continent European quickly took root and sprouted, driving literary criticism towards critical theory. Different from the ideological sharpness of the critical theory of the Frankfurt School in Germany, the contemporary American critical theory is a transformation of critical perspective of 'post-new criticism', demonstrating an interdisciplinary critical approach. Contemporary American critical theory originated from UC Irvine, and with the joining of important scholars such as Jacques Derrida and J. Hillis Miller, the Irvine School not only inherited the deconstructive tradition of the Yale School, but also led the trend in the direction of critical theory. Although critical theory has gradually moved literary criticism away from 'pure literature', the value of literary research should not be underestimated. At present, the development of critical theory is shifting from literary text to the broad cultural and political space, emphasizing the diversification of theoretical discourse in different fields such as political philosophy, gender identity, media art, ecological environment, and war refugees. This is also the future of critical theory.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
[2]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[3]
GAO Jianping
. Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 170-179.
-
[4]
YING Qi
. Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 23-31.
-
[5]
HE Jun
. Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 56-69.
-
[6]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[7]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[8]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[9]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[10]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[11]
SHI Dan
, LI Peng
. The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 45-58.
-
-