Citation:
CHEN Long and CHEN Ze. Private Rights Embedding in Platform Institutional Design——Value and Significance from Media Institutional History[J]. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 135-147.
Private Rights Embedding in Platform Institutional Design——Value and Significance from Media Institutional History
-
Abstract
As social infrastructures,digital platforms have become deeply embedded in global social practices and the organization of social relations,giving rise to platform institutions that shape the mediated practices of the public.Unlike traditional institutions grounded in collectively formed social consciousness,platform institutions are company-governed frameworks of social action that tend to prioritize platform interests over public value.Through demand-side network lock-in,supply-side data barriers,and governance-side black-box opacity,private power embedded in platform institutions gradually produces institutional lock-in.In this process,the encroachment of platform private power on public value is no longer primarily a question of normative justification;rather,it accumulates through institutional inertia and path dependence.Moreover,by relying on code as law and technical opacity,platform institutions can bypass conventional legal oversight,exclude governments and the public from rule-making,and secure formal legality while obscuring questions of substantive legitimacy.Addressing the governance dilemmas of global platform institutions therefore requires a shift from private-power competition to public-value-oriented competition.This shift depends not only on user-driven platform nomadism and reverse-engineering practices,but also on promoting the two-way global circulation of Chinese platforms to disrupt the monopolistic structure of the existing platform ecosystem.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[2]
LI Ting
. From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 143-156.
-
[3]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[4]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[5]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[6]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[7]
WAN Yong
, LI Yalan
. Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 104-116.
-
[8]
WANG Qian
. AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 118-132.
-
[9]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[10]
HU Jun
. Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 184-194.
-
[11]
LI Ming
, XU Haiqi
, XU Changtuo
. A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 91-105.
-
-