政党中心主义中西比较：21世纪的大分流

张春满; 郭苏建

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Chunman ZHANG and Sujian GUO. Comparative Study of Party Centrism between China and Western Countries: Great Divergence in the 21st Century[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 82-92. shu

Comparative Study of Party Centrism between China and Western Countries: Great Divergence in the 21st Century

Abstract

Domestic and foreign academics have increasingly enriched the research on party centrism. However, from the perspective of comparison between China and foreign countries, there are still some theoretical issues that need to be studied urgently. In the face of increasingly complex political party activities at home and abroad and their influence, we need to think deeply about whether political parties are a problem in the 21st century, or a solution to the problem? This question is important at both theoretical and practical levels. At the theoretical level, party centrism has shown completely different cognitive forms in different countries, which is manifested in the differences in the dimensions of party positioning, party nature, and the theoretical roots of party centrism. At the practical level, party politics in some countries has resulted in vicious party disputes, social tearing and political decay; in our country, the leadership of the Communist Party of my country has become the key for the country to resist risks and challenges, the people to create a better life, and the nation to achieve great rejuvenation. Fundamental security and political foundation. This paper makes a systematic comparison between China and foreign countries on party centralism, especially focusing on comparative research from the aspects of driving force, party relations, party building logic, and party building methods. Our research believes that the value of political parties in different countries has emerged huge divisions, and the great diversion in the 21st century is not manifested in differences in political systems, but in differences in political organizations.
- party centrism,
- comparative study,
- party building,
- great divergence
References
Access
1. [1]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
2. [2]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
3. [3]
  WANG Qi . From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 32-40.
4. [4]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
5. [5]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
6. [6]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
7. [7]
  LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.
8. [8]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
9. [9]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
10. [10]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
11. [11]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
12. [12]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
13. [13]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
14. [14]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
15. [15]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
16. [16]
  HE Da'an , LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.
17. [17]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.
18. [18]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 8843 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(1)
Abstract views(8843)
HTML views(984)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Comparative Study of Party Centrism between China and Western Countries: Great Divergence in the 21st Century

Chunman ZHANG
Sujian GUO

Available Online: 2023-03-20

Abstract: Domestic and foreign academics have increasingly enriched the research on party centrism. However, from the perspective of comparison between China and foreign countries, there are still some theoretical issues that need to be studied urgently. In the face of increasingly complex political party activities at home and abroad and their influence, we need to think deeply about whether political parties are a problem in the 21st century, or a solution to the problem? This question is important at both theoretical and practical levels. At the theoretical level, party centrism has shown completely different cognitive forms in different countries, which is manifested in the differences in the dimensions of party positioning, party nature, and the theoretical roots of party centrism. At the practical level, party politics in some countries has resulted in vicious party disputes, social tearing and political decay; in our country, the leadership of the Communist Party of my country has become the key for the country to resist risks and challenges, the people to create a better life, and the nation to achieve great rejuvenation. Fundamental security and political foundation. This paper makes a systematic comparison between China and foreign countries on party centralism, especially focusing on comparative research from the aspects of driving force, party relations, party building logic, and party building methods. Our research believes that the value of political parties in different countries has emerged huge divisions, and the great diversion in the 21st century is not manifested in differences in political systems, but in differences in political organizations.

HTML

Table (1) Relative (18)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Comparative Study of Party Centrism between China and Western Countries: Great Divergence in the 21st Century

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Comparative Study of Party Centrism between China and Western Countries: Great Divergence in the 21st Century

HTML

目录