Citation:
Shiye TIAN and Ping LI. Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 74-84.
Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development
-
Abstract
Based on the macroscopical, historical and systematic Marxist property rights theory paradigm, we try to establish a development perspective to understand the changes of rural land property rights system in China.From this perspective, the change of rural land property rights system since the founding of new China is a process of institutional reconstruction to adapt to the historical change of agricultural and rural farmers’ function orientation. It is a process of adapting to China’s development stage, development mode and collective economic function transformation, and reshaping the relationship among the state, the collective and the farmers. It is an adaptive adjustment process for the dynamic evolution of the dual functions of rural land in the development process; and a systematic evolution process to realize the transformation from legal rights to economic rights through supporting reforms on the basis of development which includes the realization of rural land property rights. In the interpretation of development, the core view of western property rights theory, “the validity of private property rights” and “the invalidity of public property rights”, is essentially a highly ideological Western narrative, neither conforms to the socialist value orientation of common prosperity, nor objectively reveals the multidimensional and dynamic complex relation between property rights and development. These fundamental defects make it impossible for western property rights theory to deeply understand the real logic of China’s rural land property rights system changes and “Chinese-style modernization”. In order to tell a good “Chinese story” of reform and development, guided by the Marxist theory of property and combined with China’s own practice, we must strengthen the research on property rights from the perspective of development, and promote the innovative development of the socialist property rights theory with Chinese characteristics.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
[2]
YANG Lan
, ZHOU Yahong
, XIAO Xinyue
. Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 71-83.
-
[3]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[4]
HU Yiqing
, MA Zhihao
, ZONG Yixiang
. A Decade Review and Evaluation of the Development in the Discipline of Journalism and Communication (2009—2018)——Analysis Based on the Comprehensive Index of Humanities and Social Sciences. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 206-216.
-
[5]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[6]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[7]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[8]
SHI Dan
, LI Peng
. The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 45-58.
-
[9]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[10]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[11]
WANG Jiajun
, ZHENG Ningning
. Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 158-169.
-
[12]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[13]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: