Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 58 Issue 2
February 2026
Article Contents

Citation: ZHU Bin and WEI Tianle. The Evolution of Knowledge Systems in Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences (1990—2022)[J]. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 195-209. shu

The Evolution of Knowledge Systems in Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences (1990—2022)

  • Using data from the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index and its expanded edition from 1990 to 2022,this study examines trends and current developments in the construction of China's philosophy and social sciences knowledge system through three dimensions: new concepts,new theories,and theoretical systems.The study reveals that during this period,the introduction of new concepts and theories in Chinese philosophy and social sciences gradually declined.A progressively expanding conceptual core emerged within the disciplinary conceptual network,with an increasing number of scholars engaging in dialogue with this core.This process signifies a transition from a “soft revolution” phase of borrowing Western concepts and theories to the gradual establishment of core concepts,core conclusions,and stylized facts within Chinese philosophy and social sciences,ultimately forming a stable knowledge system.These macro-level shifts can be explained through endogenous structural factors,exogenous societal influences,and individual behavioral factors.Among these,individual behavior demonstrates the most significant explanatory power: scholars'emulation of successful peers and mimicry of majority scholarly actions effectively account for the overall trend of systematization.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

    2. [2]

      HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

    3. [3]

      SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    4. [4]

      ZHAO Lin ,  ZHANG Boyu ,  LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

    5. [5]

      WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1052 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(4)
  • Abstract views(1052)
  • HTML views(112)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        The Evolution of Knowledge Systems in Chinese Philosophy and Social Sciences (1990—2022)

        Abstract: Using data from the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index and its expanded edition from 1990 to 2022,this study examines trends and current developments in the construction of China's philosophy and social sciences knowledge system through three dimensions: new concepts,new theories,and theoretical systems.The study reveals that during this period,the introduction of new concepts and theories in Chinese philosophy and social sciences gradually declined.A progressively expanding conceptual core emerged within the disciplinary conceptual network,with an increasing number of scholars engaging in dialogue with this core.This process signifies a transition from a “soft revolution” phase of borrowing Western concepts and theories to the gradual establishment of core concepts,core conclusions,and stylized facts within Chinese philosophy and social sciences,ultimately forming a stable knowledge system.These macro-level shifts can be explained through endogenous structural factors,exogenous societal influences,and individual behavioral factors.Among these,individual behavior demonstrates the most significant explanatory power: scholars'emulation of successful peers and mimicry of majority scholarly actions effectively account for the overall trend of systematization.

          HTML

        Relative (5)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return