Citation:
WEI Xiaojiang and WANG Zhihao. The Return of Things: Exploring “Moral-Material” Practice in Social Work[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(11): 121-132.
The Return of Things: Exploring “Moral-Material” Practice in Social Work
-
Abstract
Social work is a profession centered on “people”, which has led to “things” being marginalized in its theoretical framework, with their inherent helping functions remaining undervalued and underexplored. Therefore, it is necessary to bring things back to the center of social work by explicating their roles and values in professional services, thereby constructing a practice model that integrates both ethical care and material sensitivity. The paper advances this argument through three dimensions:First, it clarifies the implications of the material turn in social sciences for social work theory, emphasizing that things are not merely instrumental resources but also agential social actors. Second, drawing on the concept of quasi-objects, it categorizes things in social work practice into natural objects, instrumental objects, relational objects, and symbolic objects, demonstrating their respective functions in professional services. Third, it reflects on the roots of social work theory's tendency to “see people but not things,” proposing that social work should transcend the singular “person-to-person” moral practice and move toward a more ethically inclusive “person-thing- context” “moral-material” practice. This approach not only expands the theoretical boundaries of social work but also provides practitioners with an integrative intervention framework.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[2]
XU Xiangdong
. Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 5-15.
-
[3]
ZHANG Han
, ZHOU Xiaohong
. The Confluence of a Thousand Lakes: “Huddling for Warmth” and Business Practices of Yiwu Peasants. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 119-134.
-
[4]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[5]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[6]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[7]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
[8]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[9]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[10]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
-