要素收入分配结构朝新兴要素偏向了吗:分类贡献与城市证据
作者简介:董直庆,浙江财经大学管理学院教授(浙江杭州 310018);王鹏飞,华东师范大学经济与管理学院博士研究生(上海 200062)
基金项目:
本文为国家社会科学基金重点项目“人工智能技术红利分配均等性与企业成长方向问题研究”(24AJY029)、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“新阶段共同富裕视域下技术创新推动的经济增长动力研究”(22JJD790019)的阶段性成果
摘要: 当前,人工智能技术算法迭代加快和应用场景不断落地,在这过程中技术和数据要素的重要性愈加突显。然而,现有研究却尚未有效量化和识别新兴要素的贡献及其演变趋势。基于此,本文基于扩展的C-D生产函数,结合2003—2021年中国地级市数据,引入数据要素从分类要素贡献视角考察收入分配格局及其动态特征。研究结果发现,劳动与资本仍是经济增长的主要驱动力,收入分配份额合计超60%,而技术与数据要素贡献约12%,新要素作用存在某种“索洛悖论现象”,经过一系列稳健性检验后结果仍然稳健。同时,要素收入分配明显受制于城市属性、地理区位、基础设施和资源禀赋限制,一线城市数据(17.6%)与技术(14.4%)份额领跑全国,东部沿海地区技术和数据的协同效应显著,而中西部资源型城市则面临技术与数据要素贡献困境。与此同时,技术和数据存在周期时序性规律,在2015年后技术与数据要素贡献快速提升,尤其是数据要素份额在2018年存在显著增幅,技术和数据对经济增长贡献开始凸显。
Has the Structure of Factor Income Distribution Shifted toward Emerging Factors: Contributions of Categorized Factors and Evidence at the Prefecture-Level Cities
Abstract: With the rapid advancement of AI algorithms and expanding application scenarios,technological and data factors have become increasingly critical.This paper employs an extended C-D production function with panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities (2003—2021),incorporating data as a production factor to examine the structure and dynamics of income distribution.Findings show that labor and capital remain dominant,together accounting for over 60% of the income share,while technology and data contribute around 12%,suggesting a potential “Solow Paradox” in the impact of emerging factors.These results remain robust across various checks.Factor income distribution is shaped by city characteristics,location,infrastructure,and resource endowment.First-tier cities lead in technology (14.4%) and data (17.6%) shares,with strong synergy observed in the eastern coastal region.In contrast,resource-based cities in central and western China struggle to harness new factors.Notably,since 2015,the contributions of technology and data have risen significantly,especially data in 2018—underscoring their growing role in economic growth.