Citation:
XU Songying and HUANG Xiongying. Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 129-143.
Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”
-
Abstract
“The state as machine” metaphor has a unique place in the history of modern political thought and among the theories of the state. Three genealogies of “the state as machine” emerged after the emergence of mechanistic philosophy in the seventeenth century: (1) the state as a rational machine that operates autonomously, as represented by Hobbes, Cameralism, and Max Weber; (2) the state as a complex machine of checks and balances on power, as represented by Montesquieu and the Federalists; (3) the state as a dynamic machine of class rule, as represented by Marxism. Clarifying the history of the development of “the state as machine” not only helps us to understand the metaphor's theoretical near-death and practical pseudo-death, but also prompts us to fairly examine its place in intellectual history and its contemporary significance.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[2]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[3]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[4]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[5]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
-