Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 57 Issue 7
August 2025
Article Contents

Citation: XU Songying and HUANG Xiongying. Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(7): 129-143. shu

Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”

  • “The state as machine” metaphor has a unique place in the history of modern political thought and among the theories of the state. Three genealogies of “the state as machine” emerged after the emergence of mechanistic philosophy in the seventeenth century: (1) the state as a rational machine that operates autonomously, as represented by Hobbes, Cameralism, and Max Weber; (2) the state as a complex machine of checks and balances on power, as represented by Montesquieu and the Federalists; (3) the state as a dynamic machine of class rule, as represented by Marxism. Clarifying the history of the development of “the state as machine” not only helps us to understand the metaphor's theoretical near-death and practical pseudo-death, but also prompts us to fairly examine its place in intellectual history and its contemporary significance.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      SUO Liming WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    2. [2]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    3. [3]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    4. [4]

      ZHAO Lin ZHANG Boyu LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

    5. [5]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

Article Metrics

Article views: 5464 Times PDF downloads: 4 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(4)
  • Abstract views(5464)
  • HTML views(411)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Rationality, Balance, and Domination: The Meaning and Genealogy of “The State as Machine”

        Abstract: “The state as machine” metaphor has a unique place in the history of modern political thought and among the theories of the state. Three genealogies of “the state as machine” emerged after the emergence of mechanistic philosophy in the seventeenth century: (1) the state as a rational machine that operates autonomously, as represented by Hobbes, Cameralism, and Max Weber; (2) the state as a complex machine of checks and balances on power, as represented by Montesquieu and the Federalists; (3) the state as a dynamic machine of class rule, as represented by Marxism. Clarifying the history of the development of “the state as machine” not only helps us to understand the metaphor's theoretical near-death and practical pseudo-death, but also prompts us to fairly examine its place in intellectual history and its contemporary significance.

          HTML

        Relative (5)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return