Citation:
Hua’nan GONG. Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 32-44.
Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century
-
Abstract
As the key words of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, the admirers of science, conscience, and nature not only argued, but also learned from each other and shaped each other, which made the meaning of the three constantly enriched and formed three new concepts. In this process, Chinese philosophical scholars look at science through conscience and nature, and make science continue to be conscience and natural; conscience gradually reconciles with science in disputes with science, and jointly suppresses nature; nature is under the suppression of science and conscience, it constantly reconciles with the two, and then is understood as the reason for the humanity. The controversy among conscience, nature and science is a concrete manifestation of the dispute between ancient and modern, Chinese and Western, and the tension among the three has continuously expanded and enriched the connotation of Chinese philosophy. The result of the three disputes made the believable be lovely and the beloved believable. To a certain extent, it resolved the tension between the believable and the beloved that had plagued Chinese scholars for a century, and pushed Chinese philosophy in the 20th century. To a new realm has also contributed Chinese wisdom to resolve the opposition between scientism and humanism. Summarizing the controversy among conscience, nature and science will not only help profoundly understand and grasp the rich connotations of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, but will also benefit the new development of Chinese philosophy in the 21st century.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
HE Jun
. Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 56-69.
-
[2]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[3]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
[4]
GAO Jianping
. Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 170-179.
-
[5]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[6]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[7]
LI Ting
. From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 143-156.
-
[8]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[9]
ZHAN Ling
. Adolescent Narratives and the Poetic Evolution of Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 166-175.
-
[10]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[11]
HE Yuhong
, ZHANG Chen
. The Transformation of Han Territories' Rule Strategy in the Jin Dynasty and the Identification of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 205-216.
-
[12]
GE Yonghai
, PAN Juqiang
. Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 159-173.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: