从“构成性策略”到“新本体论奠基方案”——社会批判规范标准的再奠基

周爱民

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

October 2025

Article Contents

Citation: ZHOU Aimin. From “Constitutive Strategy” to “A New Ontological Grounding Program”——Lay Foundation Again of Normative Criteria for Social Critique[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(9): 25-34. shu

From “Constitutive Strategy” to “A New Ontological Grounding Program”——Lay Foundation Again of Normative Criteria for Social Critique

ZHOU Aimin

Abstract

In discussions of social critique methodologies, the Frankfurt School's critical theory continues to adhere to a distinctive form of 'immanent critique. ' Immanent critique not only demands that criticism be conducted according to the object's own standards but also emphasizes that the internal criteria of critique must possess universal validity. In justifying the universal validity of these internal standards, the 'constitutive strategy' has been widely adopted. This strategy attempts to establish a universally valid normative foundation for critical standards by reconstructing the constitutive principles of social practices. However, this approach faces unresolved challenges in social ontology and normative binding force. Confronting the difficulty of ultimately grounding normative standards, contemporary scholars such as Freyenhagen and Saar have proposed maintaining critique by abandoning the ultimate grounding project. While offering cogent critiques of prevailing grounding strategies, their solutions remain problematic, as they ultimately rely on certain grounding frameworks that contradict their theoretical claims about critique. To preserve the critical dimension, critical theory cannot evade the problem of universally justifying its own normative criteria. On this point, building upon Menke's conception of the 'paradox of norms, ' a 'new ontological grounding program' can be outlined. This approach not only avoids presupposing a contradiction-free social existence but also provides robust normative justification for critique, thereby effectively addressing the challenges of social ontology and normative binding force.
- critical theory,
- immanent critique,
- constitutive strategy,
- paradox of norms
References
Access
1. [1]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
2. [2]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
3. [3]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
4. [4]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.
5. [5]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
6. [6]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
7. [7]
  LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.
8. [8]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
9. [9]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
10. [10]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
11. [11]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
12. [12]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
13. [13]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
14. [14]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
15. [15]
  HE Da'an , LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.
16. [16]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
17. [17]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1532 Times PDF downloads: 3 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(3)
Abstract views(1532)
HTML views(210)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

From “Constitutive Strategy” to “A New Ontological Grounding Program”——Lay Foundation Again of Normative Criteria for Social Critique

ZHOU Aimin

Abstract: In discussions of social critique methodologies, the Frankfurt School's critical theory continues to adhere to a distinctive form of 'immanent critique. ' Immanent critique not only demands that criticism be conducted according to the object's own standards but also emphasizes that the internal criteria of critique must possess universal validity. In justifying the universal validity of these internal standards, the 'constitutive strategy' has been widely adopted. This strategy attempts to establish a universally valid normative foundation for critical standards by reconstructing the constitutive principles of social practices. However, this approach faces unresolved challenges in social ontology and normative binding force. Confronting the difficulty of ultimately grounding normative standards, contemporary scholars such as Freyenhagen and Saar have proposed maintaining critique by abandoning the ultimate grounding project. While offering cogent critiques of prevailing grounding strategies, their solutions remain problematic, as they ultimately rely on certain grounding frameworks that contradict their theoretical claims about critique. To preserve the critical dimension, critical theory cannot evade the problem of universally justifying its own normative criteria. On this point, building upon Menke's conception of the 'paradox of norms, ' a 'new ontological grounding program' can be outlined. This approach not only avoids presupposing a contradiction-free social existence but also provides robust normative justification for critique, thereby effectively addressing the challenges of social ontology and normative binding force.

HTML

Relative (17)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

From “Constitutive Strategy” to “A New Ontological Grounding Program”——Lay Foundation Again of Normative Criteria for Social Critique

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

From “Constitutive Strategy” to “A New Ontological Grounding Program”——Lay Foundation Again of Normative Criteria for Social Critique

HTML

目录