Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 11
January 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Yong ZHU. “Identity between Bureaucratic Establishment and Legal System”: The Way of Great-Power Governance in Ancient China[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 95-104. shu

“Identity between Bureaucratic Establishment and Legal System”: The Way of Great-Power Governance in Ancient China

  • In ancient China, the main body of the society was distinctly differentiated into emperor, government officials and the common people by law. On this basis, there are five kinds of social relations which should be regulated by different laws according to their differences. The relationships in relation to government officials, namely the relations between emperor and government officials, between government officials themselves and between government officials and the common people, were specially regulated by means of the control of the key parts of the power structure and the key links of the power operation system. In this way can the order and efficiency of state governance and social management effectively promoted. Based on the special regulation of the relationships in relation to government officials and the behavior of the government officials, the civil and military officials were personally strictly regulated by the law and the construction of the institutional model “identity between bureaucratic establishment and legal system” (“官法同构”) was promoted. The institutional model “identity between bureaucratic establishment and legal system” accords with the essential requirements of the great-power governance in ancient China, a country with large population, vast territory and diverse culture. This institutional model plays a positive role in maintaining national unity, imperial power and the centralized political system, and then in achieving political stability, improving management efficiency and so on.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      SUO Liming WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

    2. [2]

      WAN Yong LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

    3. [3]

      LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.

    4. [4]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    5. [5]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3834 Times PDF downloads: 20 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(20)
  • Abstract views(3834)
  • HTML views(627)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        “Identity between Bureaucratic Establishment and Legal System”: The Way of Great-Power Governance in Ancient China

        Abstract: In ancient China, the main body of the society was distinctly differentiated into emperor, government officials and the common people by law. On this basis, there are five kinds of social relations which should be regulated by different laws according to their differences. The relationships in relation to government officials, namely the relations between emperor and government officials, between government officials themselves and between government officials and the common people, were specially regulated by means of the control of the key parts of the power structure and the key links of the power operation system. In this way can the order and efficiency of state governance and social management effectively promoted. Based on the special regulation of the relationships in relation to government officials and the behavior of the government officials, the civil and military officials were personally strictly regulated by the law and the construction of the institutional model “identity between bureaucratic establishment and legal system” (“官法同构”) was promoted. The institutional model “identity between bureaucratic establishment and legal system” accords with the essential requirements of the great-power governance in ancient China, a country with large population, vast territory and diverse culture. This institutional model plays a positive role in maintaining national unity, imperial power and the centralized political system, and then in achieving political stability, improving management efficiency and so on.

          HTML

        Relative (5)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return