Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 58 Issue 7
July 2026
Article Contents

Citation: SHEN Yifei. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context[J]. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142. shu

Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context

  • In contemporary society, emotion has entered value production, exchange, and the organization of social relations to an unprecedented degree. However, existing discussions of the "emotional economy" have long faced three related difficulties:the coexistence of conceptual overexpansion and overspecification, the conflation of different theoretical lineages, and insufficient explanatory power in the Chinese context. This article systematically reviews four major strands of scholarship:emotional labor; post-Fordism and immaterial labor; emotional capitalism and affective economies; and platformization and emotional governance. On this basis, it proposes a core criterion for identifying the emotional economy, namely, whether emotion has shifted from a "private feeling" to a social resource that can be produced, mobilized, measured, exchanged, or disciplined. The article further develops a three-level analytical framework-object, mechanism, and explanation-and distinguishes between two basic forms:an emotionally embedded economy and an economy of emotional objectification. It argues that the distinctiveness of China's emotional economy lies not only in the larger scale of platforms or the greater density of mediated settings, but also in the fact that it unfolds within a social order already deeply structured by relationality, moral obligations, and differentiated social ties. Rather than simply replacing the relational society, platforms are re-encoding it by transforming emotional exchanges once organized through differential obligations and everyday reciprocity into new relational mechanisms that are visible, quantifiable, subscribable, and governable. The emotional economy, therefore, should be understood not merely as an extension of the commodification of emotion, but as an important mechanism through which the relational order is being reorganized in the platform era. In this sense, the article aims to provide an operational analytical framework for the study of the emotional economy and a new theoretical lens for understanding social transformation in contemporary China.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    2. [2]

      YU Jianxing LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    3. [3]

      ZHAO Lin ZHANG Boyu LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

    4. [4]

      LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.

    5. [5]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    6. [6]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

Article Metrics

Article views: 49 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(49)
  • HTML views(9)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context

        Abstract: In contemporary society, emotion has entered value production, exchange, and the organization of social relations to an unprecedented degree. However, existing discussions of the "emotional economy" have long faced three related difficulties:the coexistence of conceptual overexpansion and overspecification, the conflation of different theoretical lineages, and insufficient explanatory power in the Chinese context. This article systematically reviews four major strands of scholarship:emotional labor; post-Fordism and immaterial labor; emotional capitalism and affective economies; and platformization and emotional governance. On this basis, it proposes a core criterion for identifying the emotional economy, namely, whether emotion has shifted from a "private feeling" to a social resource that can be produced, mobilized, measured, exchanged, or disciplined. The article further develops a three-level analytical framework-object, mechanism, and explanation-and distinguishes between two basic forms:an emotionally embedded economy and an economy of emotional objectification. It argues that the distinctiveness of China's emotional economy lies not only in the larger scale of platforms or the greater density of mediated settings, but also in the fact that it unfolds within a social order already deeply structured by relationality, moral obligations, and differentiated social ties. Rather than simply replacing the relational society, platforms are re-encoding it by transforming emotional exchanges once organized through differential obligations and everyday reciprocity into new relational mechanisms that are visible, quantifiable, subscribable, and governable. The emotional economy, therefore, should be understood not merely as an extension of the commodification of emotion, but as an important mechanism through which the relational order is being reorganized in the platform era. In this sense, the article aims to provide an operational analytical framework for the study of the emotional economy and a new theoretical lens for understanding social transformation in contemporary China.

          HTML

        Relative (6)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return