世界文学可以编码吗——功能分化时代的文学理念
作者简介:范劲,中山大学中国语言文学系教授 (广东广州 510275)。
基金项目:
本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“世界文学基本文献整理、多元谱系与观念重塑” (24&ZD243)的阶段性成果
摘要: 世界文学可否编码,关系到世界文学是否为一个自我引导的运作系统,这是世界文学理论绕不过去的问题。这一问题接续德国理论界曾经热议的艺术和文学的编码问题,也有可能循此线索获得答案。20世纪八九十年代,德国的文学理论界开始把文学看成自主交流系统,而系统自治的标志是拥有独立的符码。就这一符码是什么的问题,人们提出了各种方案,如美/丑、有趣/无聊、文学/非文学等。共谋性的争议强化着一个共识,即文学是可以编码的。进一步,罗伯茨、勒曼等揭示了艺术符码隐含的世界维度。因此,文学可以编码,意味着世界文学可以编码。而从更大的社会历史关联来说,文学或世界文学的编码问题是对当代的文学危机话语的回应,以一种后形而上学的方式重新肯定了文学运作的实在性、统一性和普遍性。
Can World Literature Be Coded——Literary Ideas in an Age of Functional Differentiation
Abstract: Whether world literature can be coded means whether world literature constitutes a self-guiding operational system,an unavoidable question in the theory of world literature. This question follows up on the once hotly debated issue of coding in art and literature within German theoretical circles,and it may be possible to find an answer by following this line of inquiry. In the 1980s and 1990s,German literary theorists began to view literature as an autonomous communication system,with the possession of an independent code serving as the hallmark of systemic autonomy. Various proposals have been put forward regarding the nature of this code,such as beautiful / ugly,interesting/ boring,and literary/ non-literary. The collaborative nature of this debate reinforces a consensus that literature is codable. Furthermore,Roberts,Lehmann and others have revealed the world dimension implicit in artistic codes. If literature as such can be coded,it logically follows that world literature can be coded too. From a broader socio-historical perspective,the question of the coding of literature—or world literature—constitutes a response to contemporary discourses on the crisis in literature,reaffirming,in a post-metaphysical manner,the reality,unity and universality of literary practice.