Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 58 Issue 8
August 2026
Article Contents

Citation: XIE Yue. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117. shu

How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance

  • Classical scholarship,grounded in studies of Western European nation-states,has developed “state capacity” into a central concept in the social sciences and widely applied it to the analysis of developing countries. However,this body of cross-national research,primarily concerned with the origins of state capacity,often overlooks the distinctive logic of capacity formation in the Third World. As a result,it struggles to explain why,in the absence of significant changes in structural conditions,the same country may exhibit markedly different governance outcomes across historical periods or policy domains. Taking this puzzle as its point of departure,this article adopts a process-mechanism approach to trace causal linkages among concrete actions in governance. It conceptualizes state capacity as a form of governing potential and emphasizes how,under conditions of multiple concurrent tasks and structural tensions,the state transforms potential into effective capacity through goal adjustment,resource concentration,and experiential learning. The level of performance in this transformation depends on whether state actions at different stages can maintain a dynamic equilibrium among political coordination,administrative implementation,and societal response. Such equilibrium arises from the interaction and recombination of multiple mechanisms. In this way,the article moves beyond explanations that attribute variations in state capacity to static structural factors such as war or institutional design,and instead treats it as the outcome of a dynamic,interactive process. This shift not only enhances the explanatory power for governance variation in developing countries but also provides a testable analytical framework for understanding China's experience of state governance modernization.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

    2. [2]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    3. [3]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    4. [4]

      ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

Article Metrics

Article views: 26 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(26)
  • HTML views(6)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance

        Abstract: Classical scholarship,grounded in studies of Western European nation-states,has developed “state capacity” into a central concept in the social sciences and widely applied it to the analysis of developing countries. However,this body of cross-national research,primarily concerned with the origins of state capacity,often overlooks the distinctive logic of capacity formation in the Third World. As a result,it struggles to explain why,in the absence of significant changes in structural conditions,the same country may exhibit markedly different governance outcomes across historical periods or policy domains. Taking this puzzle as its point of departure,this article adopts a process-mechanism approach to trace causal linkages among concrete actions in governance. It conceptualizes state capacity as a form of governing potential and emphasizes how,under conditions of multiple concurrent tasks and structural tensions,the state transforms potential into effective capacity through goal adjustment,resource concentration,and experiential learning. The level of performance in this transformation depends on whether state actions at different stages can maintain a dynamic equilibrium among political coordination,administrative implementation,and societal response. Such equilibrium arises from the interaction and recombination of multiple mechanisms. In this way,the article moves beyond explanations that attribute variations in state capacity to static structural factors such as war or institutional design,and instead treats it as the outcome of a dynamic,interactive process. This shift not only enhances the explanatory power for governance variation in developing countries but also provides a testable analytical framework for understanding China's experience of state governance modernization.

          HTML

        Relative (4)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return