Abstract: Different from one-dimensional technological instrumentalism or institutional change theory. The collaborative evolution of technological tool embeddedness, institutional structure adaptability, and value norm orientation is the inherent logic of government adaptive governance in the era of artificial intelligence. In terms of technology, the expansion of algorithmic power and the reconstruction of governance authority through data monopolies have led to the risk of "technological Leviathan"; The institutional dimension needs to break through bureaucratic rigidity and achieve dynamic adjustment through flexible legislation and organizational innovation; The value dimension emphasizes the ethical domestication of instrumental rationality through the principles of fairness, transparency, and humanism. Through case studies, it was further discovered that China has actually formed a governance paradigm of integrating technology into the socialization system. The technology system is no longer seen as an independent variable external to the social structure, but is organically integrated into the national governance system, becoming an endogenous driving force for the evolution of social forms.