Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 3
June 2019
Article Contents

Citation: Zhongqi WANG. Interaction and Integration: Dynamics and Boundaries of China’s Development of Democracy at the Grassroots Level[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(3): 82-94. shu

Interaction and Integration: Dynamics and Boundaries of China’s Development of Democracy at the Grassroots Level

  • The central government, local governments and social forces constitute the three basic forces which promoting the development of democracy at the grassroots level in contemporary China. The greatest concerns of those three major agents are namely legitimacy, performance and interest. In the course of democratic development, the three agents interact with each other for their greatest concern. The interactions between the agents shaped the basic form of democratic development process and the state of the separation and integration of the legitimacy, the performance and the interests determines the outcome of a particular democratic practice. The interactions between the three agents are not arbitrary, but on the basis of the " power structure” and " context structure”. Structure, especially the text structure is the basis of the activists, and the constraints of the actors and behavior boundaries. If the legitimacy, performance and interests are highly integrated, the democratic practice is likely to be institutionalized. If the legitimacy, performance and interests are highly separated, the democratic practice will be interrupted.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HU Yiqing ,  MA Zhihao ,  ZONG Yixiang . A Decade Review and Evaluation of the Development in the Discipline of Journalism and Communication (2009—2018)——Analysis Based on the Comprehensive Index of Humanities and Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 206-216.

    2. [2]

      YANG Lan ,  ZHOU Yahong ,  XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.

    3. [3]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    4. [4]

      XU Yong . Community Consolidation through Institutions: An Analysis of the Micro-institutions of Small-Scale Groups. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 77-90.

    5. [5]

      ZHANG Yahui ,  Xia Dao Cai Rang . Mandala and Shambhala: An Anthropological Analysis of the Origin Myth for the Ches-pa Tribe. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 158-169.

    6. [6]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    7. [7]

      SHI Dan ,  LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.

    8. [8]

      DI Jinhua ,  XIAO Mingjia . The Production of Flexibility in Local Governments and the Softening of Budgetary Constraints——An Analysis Based on Township-Owned Enterprises in Xixiang. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 147-157.

Figures(1)

Article Metrics

Article views: 6470 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(2)
  • Abstract views(6470)
  • HTML views(524)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Interaction and Integration: Dynamics and Boundaries of China’s Development of Democracy at the Grassroots Level

          Abstract: The central government, local governments and social forces constitute the three basic forces which promoting the development of democracy at the grassroots level in contemporary China. The greatest concerns of those three major agents are namely legitimacy, performance and interest. In the course of democratic development, the three agents interact with each other for their greatest concern. The interactions between the agents shaped the basic form of democratic development process and the state of the separation and integration of the legitimacy, the performance and the interests determines the outcome of a particular democratic practice. The interactions between the three agents are not arbitrary, but on the basis of the " power structure” and " context structure”. Structure, especially the text structure is the basis of the activists, and the constraints of the actors and behavior boundaries. If the legitimacy, performance and interests are highly integrated, the democratic practice is likely to be institutionalized. If the legitimacy, performance and interests are highly separated, the democratic practice will be interrupted.

            HTML

          Figure (1)  Relative (8)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return