比例原则目的正当性审查方法新论——一个融合法经济学、商谈理论的视角

翟翌，金龙君

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

March 2024

Article Contents

Citation: ZHAI Yi. A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 107-119. shu

A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory

ZHAI Yi

Abstract

The lack of appropriate review methods has led to disputes over the hierarchy of the principle of legitimacy of purpose,as well as issues such as review misalignment,insufficient review,excessive subjectivity,and inaccuracy caused by some scholars simply copying the principle of reasonableness of common law to determine the inappropriate purpose in the principle of proportionality.The key to solving the problem lies in reconstructing the method of examining the legitimacy of the purpose.The principle of proportionality,the common methods of law and economics,and negotiation theory can be integrated to construct a new approach for examining the legitimacy of purposes.Starting from the “comparative” thinking,the purpose of examining the legitimacy of purposes can be classified into two categories: “the purpose of realizing (safeguarding) rights (interests)” and “the purpose of restricting rights (interests)”,and the corresponding objective and subjective content can be compared and examined.In the review process,the objective content corresponding to the purpose should be quantified and reviewed first,and then the subjective content corresponding to the purpose should be reviewed.In terms of examination standards,based on the improvement of Kaldor Hicks,the objective content corresponding to the legitimacy examination standard quantified by law and economics is that the value of “realization (protection)” is greater than “limitation”; The examination of subjective content corresponding to the purpose is achieved through equal and free negotiation.The objective and subjective content corresponding to the purpose has passed the legitimacy review,and the purpose is legitimate.By combining the advantages of the principle of proportionality and the principles of law and economics,and using the common “comparison” method of proportionality,law and economics,and negotiation theory as the connection point,we can better understand and practice the principle of proportionality.
- the principle of proportionality,comparison,legitimacy of purpose,law and economics,negotiation theory
References
Access
1. [1]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
2. [2]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.
3. [3]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
4. [4]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
5. [5]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
6. [6]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
7. [7]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
8. [8]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
9. [9]
  FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.
10. [10]
  YANG Lan , ZHOU Yahong , XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.
11. [11]
  ZHANG Jun , FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.
12. [12]
  GE Yonghai , PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.
13. [13]
  SHI Dan , LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.
14. [14]
  GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.
15. [15]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
16. [16]
  XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.
17. [17]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
18. [18]
  MA Chunhua , ZHANG Jingyi . “Science Fiction Yearns for Gender” : Death Ray on a Coral Island and Its Adaptations in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 176-184.
19. [19]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
20. [20]
  LIU Xuguang . Aesthetic Reflective Pleasure: On the Characteristic and Component of Aesthetic Pleasure. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 194-204.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4259 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(10)
Abstract views(4259)
HTML views(856)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory

ZHAI Yi

Abstract: The lack of appropriate review methods has led to disputes over the hierarchy of the principle of legitimacy of purpose,as well as issues such as review misalignment,insufficient review,excessive subjectivity,and inaccuracy caused by some scholars simply copying the principle of reasonableness of common law to determine the inappropriate purpose in the principle of proportionality.The key to solving the problem lies in reconstructing the method of examining the legitimacy of the purpose.The principle of proportionality,the common methods of law and economics,and negotiation theory can be integrated to construct a new approach for examining the legitimacy of purposes.Starting from the “comparative” thinking,the purpose of examining the legitimacy of purposes can be classified into two categories: “the purpose of realizing (safeguarding) rights (interests)” and “the purpose of restricting rights (interests)”,and the corresponding objective and subjective content can be compared and examined.In the review process,the objective content corresponding to the purpose should be quantified and reviewed first,and then the subjective content corresponding to the purpose should be reviewed.In terms of examination standards,based on the improvement of Kaldor Hicks,the objective content corresponding to the legitimacy examination standard quantified by law and economics is that the value of “realization (protection)” is greater than “limitation”; The examination of subjective content corresponding to the purpose is achieved through equal and free negotiation.The objective and subjective content corresponding to the purpose has passed the legitimacy review,and the purpose is legitimate.By combining the advantages of the principle of proportionality and the principles of law and economics,and using the common “comparison” method of proportionality,law and economics,and negotiation theory as the connection point,we can better understand and practice the principle of proportionality.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

A New Discussion on the Justification Review Method of the Principle of Proportionality—— A Perspective that Integrates Law,Economics,and Negotiation Theory

HTML

目录