中国涉外法治研究主体性建构的悖论及其超越
Paradox in the Subjectivity Construction of Chinese Foreign-Related Legal Research and Its Transcendence
-
摘要: 当前中国涉外法治研究的主体性发展陷入“既自我认同又自我否定”的困境中。西方以“全球化”和“现代化”为名主导国际法治并温和渗透到中国涉外法治知识体系。在此影响下，中国学界开始自我东方化：一方面认为中国与西方在涉外治理上的差异是一种“落后”，这种认识激发了强烈的主体性意识和进步意愿；另一方面，在建设中国涉外法治时，又因“落后”情结而认为中国本土缺少可行的知识资源，只能依赖西方，而西方知识资源的长期影响又抑制了中国自主创新的动力和能力。摆脱这种困境应当立足于中国实际，接纳和吸收来自西方的、本土的以及非西方国家的涉外法治理论与经验，形成多元化的涉外法治知识资源格局。Abstract: The current development of subjectivity is facing a dilemma: the coexistence of self-identification and self-denial.In the name of Globalization and Modernization,the West leads the international rule of law and gradually penetrates into the building of Chinese foreign-related legal knowledge system.With this influence,the Chinese academia is self-Orientalized.On the one hand,scholars believe that the differences between China and the West in terms of foreign-related governance indicate an underdevelopment,which stimulates a strong Chinese consciousness and a willingness to develop; One the other hand,when developing China’s own picture of foreign-related rule of law,scholars deny indigenous sources and heavily rely on Western sources——but the strong influence of Western sources in turn restrains the motivation and capability of theoretical innovation.A solution for the dilemma is breaking away from self-orientalization and constructing a pluralist system based on China’s national conditions,namely Chinese foreign-related legal research should absorb any knowledge sources contributing to the development of Chinese foreign-related rule of law,no matter they are Western,indigenous or non-Western.
-
Key words:
- Chinese foreign-related rule of law
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2596
- HTML全文浏览量: 398
下载:
沪公网安备 31010102003103号