服务业对外开放与自由化：基本趋势、国际比较与中国对策

程大中; 虞丽; 汪宁

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

January 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Dazhong CHENG, Li YU and Ning WANG. Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 40-59. shu

Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy

Department of World Economy and Institute for World Economy, Fudan University

Abstract

This paper firstly examines the global trend and institutional evolution in economic tertiarization and services liberalization, and then employs the popular STRI indices to evaluate the levels of opening-up and liberalization of China’s service sectors through a global comparison. The growth, liberalization, and opening-up of service sectors are the general trend of world economic development, while comparing with other economies especially developed economies, China’s service sectors exhibits a lower level of development and opening-up. China is one of the few economies that have the highest restriction barriers in services markets. All service sectors except for architecture are subject to restriction barriers above the sample average, and six sectors including broadcasting, courier, motion, recording, telecommunication, and digital services are most heavily restricted. Considering the long-run development of Chinese economy, the evolution of global economic and trade institution especially the services trade institution, and the chronical trend of Sino-US trade frictions, China should actively expand and deepen the market-oriented reform and opening-up in services, so as to improve the international competitivness of service sectors.
- service industry,
- services trade,
- restriction barriers,
- Chinese economy
References
Access
1. [1]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
2. [2]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
3. [3]
  ZHANG Jun , FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.
4. [4]
  YANG Lan , ZHOU Yahong , XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.
5. [5]
  HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.
6. [6]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
7. [7]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.
8. [8]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
9. [9]
  ZHAN Ling . Adolescent Narratives and the Poetic Evolution of Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 166-175.
10. [10]
  HE Yuhong , ZHANG Chen . The Transformation of Han Territories' Rule Strategy in the Jin Dynasty and the Identification of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 205-216.
11. [11]
  GE Yonghai , PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.

Figures(25) / Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 7374 Times PDF downloads: 43 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(43)
Abstract views(7374)
HTML views(461)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy

Department of World Economy and Institute for World Economy, Fudan University

Available Online: 2019-11-01

Abstract: This paper firstly examines the global trend and institutional evolution in economic tertiarization and services liberalization, and then employs the popular STRI indices to evaluate the levels of opening-up and liberalization of China’s service sectors through a global comparison. The growth, liberalization, and opening-up of service sectors are the general trend of world economic development, while comparing with other economies especially developed economies, China’s service sectors exhibits a lower level of development and opening-up. China is one of the few economies that have the highest restriction barriers in services markets. All service sectors except for architecture are subject to restriction barriers above the sample average, and six sectors including broadcasting, courier, motion, recording, telecommunication, and digital services are most heavily restricted. Considering the long-run development of Chinese economy, the evolution of global economic and trade institution especially the services trade institution, and the chronical trend of Sino-US trade frictions, China should actively expand and deepen the market-oriented reform and opening-up in services, so as to improve the international competitivness of service sectors.