Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 12
March 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Songhua FANG and Wufeng XIONG. A Comparison of Chinese and Western Philosophy and the Construction of Contemporary “Chinese Philosophy”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 5-12. shu

A Comparison of Chinese and Western Philosophy and the Construction of Contemporary “Chinese Philosophy”

  • The comparison of Chinese and Western philosophy is a basic context of philosophical studies “in China” since the near-modern time, while the current morphology of constructing “Chinese philosophy” is an urgent task for Chinese philosophical circle. The systematic introduction of Western philosophy and the Chinese form of Marxism, as well as a hundred years of writing “history of Chinese philosophy”, are the historical experience worthy much emphasis and sorting. There are difficulties in further comparison, i.e., it is going far from the target of constructing the current form of Chinese philosophy by combining Chinese, Western and Marxist philosophy, and the so-called “legitimacy” of Chinese philosophy at the turn of the century. The censure comes either to the “Chinese nature” of writing “the history of Chinese philosophy”, or to the “philosophical nature” in Chinese philosophical tradition. An essential progress requires not only to break a double mistake of “Chinese non-philosophy” and “philosophy non-China” based on a true grasp of the quintessence of Western philosophical tradition, but also to realize the current development of Marxist philosophy based on a critical dialogue with the recent development of contemporary Western philosophy. It is necessary to have a re-vision of the true nature of ancient Chinese philosophical tradition with a modern way of discourse based on keeping a proper “distance” between “us” and our cultural tradition. It is also necessary to view the historical changes of Chinese social life and philosophical currents since the near-modern time with a future China as the reference. The said construction of contemporary morphology of “Chinese philosophy” may not be realized by “one person or one school” and, rather, by a wholly new ecology of academy, and a necessary development of the spirit of time in all spheres of culture and thought.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HE Jun . Confucius's Paradigm Shaping of Chinese Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 56-69.

    2. [2]

      ZHAN Ling . Adolescent Narratives and the Poetic Evolution of Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 166-175.

    3. [3]

      GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.

    4. [4]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    5. [5]

      WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

    6. [6]

      FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.

    7. [7]

      SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.

    8. [8]

      LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.

    9. [9]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    10. [10]

      YANG Dian ,  DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.

    11. [11]

      HE Yuhong ,  ZHANG Chen . The Transformation of Han Territories' Rule Strategy in the Jin Dynasty and the Identification of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 205-216.

    12. [12]

      GE Yonghai ,  PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.

Article Metrics

Article views: 4635 Times PDF downloads: 33 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(33)
  • Abstract views(4635)
  • HTML views(810)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        A Comparison of Chinese and Western Philosophy and the Construction of Contemporary “Chinese Philosophy”

        Abstract: The comparison of Chinese and Western philosophy is a basic context of philosophical studies “in China” since the near-modern time, while the current morphology of constructing “Chinese philosophy” is an urgent task for Chinese philosophical circle. The systematic introduction of Western philosophy and the Chinese form of Marxism, as well as a hundred years of writing “history of Chinese philosophy”, are the historical experience worthy much emphasis and sorting. There are difficulties in further comparison, i.e., it is going far from the target of constructing the current form of Chinese philosophy by combining Chinese, Western and Marxist philosophy, and the so-called “legitimacy” of Chinese philosophy at the turn of the century. The censure comes either to the “Chinese nature” of writing “the history of Chinese philosophy”, or to the “philosophical nature” in Chinese philosophical tradition. An essential progress requires not only to break a double mistake of “Chinese non-philosophy” and “philosophy non-China” based on a true grasp of the quintessence of Western philosophical tradition, but also to realize the current development of Marxist philosophy based on a critical dialogue with the recent development of contemporary Western philosophy. It is necessary to have a re-vision of the true nature of ancient Chinese philosophical tradition with a modern way of discourse based on keeping a proper “distance” between “us” and our cultural tradition. It is also necessary to view the historical changes of Chinese social life and philosophical currents since the near-modern time with a future China as the reference. The said construction of contemporary morphology of “Chinese philosophy” may not be realized by “one person or one school” and, rather, by a wholly new ecology of academy, and a necessary development of the spirit of time in all spheres of culture and thought.

          HTML

        Relative (12)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return