Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 56 Issue 12
January 2025
Article Contents

    Citation: GUO Chunzhen. From Embedding to Convergence:The Relationship and Optimization between Technological Governance and Legal Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(12): 100-111. shu

    From Embedding to Convergence:The Relationship and Optimization between Technological Governance and Legal Governance

    • Abstract

      In the digital age,technological governance and legal governance should transcend the limitations of the “embedded co-governance” model,forming a “bidirectional integration” relationship through interaction.At present,there is a linear and one-way embedded relationship between technological governance and legal governance,and there is internal tension between them in three dimensions:the underlying logic,the operating mechanism and the power effect,showing a suspended state of “dual co-governance” and “outwardly united but inwardly divided” as a whole.The bidirectional integration of technology and law is a continuation,advancement,and transcendence of the embedded co-governance relationship.This approach not only ensures the primordial status of the law,but also carries out dual transformation of technological and legal governance,and integrates technological logic with the rule of law thinking,providing a holistic solution for optimizing the relationship between technological and legal governance.Specifically,this can be achieved by exploring the commonalities in the underlying logic of technological and legal governance,constructing a unified operational mechanism,and realizing aligned power effects,thereby promoting the integrated evolution and optimized development of their relationship.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.

      2. [2]

        HE Da'an ,  LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.

      3. [3]

        SUO Liming ,  WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.

      4. [4]

        XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

      5. [5]

        DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

      6. [6]

        XIONG Changkun ,  ZHANG Ziyuan . Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 198-210.

      7. [7]

        WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

      8. [8]

        YANG Lan ,  ZHOU Yahong ,  XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.

      9. [9]

        LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 2944 Times PDF downloads: 6 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(6)
    • Abstract views(2944)
    • HTML views(429)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          From Embedding to Convergence:The Relationship and Optimization between Technological Governance and Legal Governance

          Abstract: In the digital age,technological governance and legal governance should transcend the limitations of the “embedded co-governance” model,forming a “bidirectional integration” relationship through interaction.At present,there is a linear and one-way embedded relationship between technological governance and legal governance,and there is internal tension between them in three dimensions:the underlying logic,the operating mechanism and the power effect,showing a suspended state of “dual co-governance” and “outwardly united but inwardly divided” as a whole.The bidirectional integration of technology and law is a continuation,advancement,and transcendence of the embedded co-governance relationship.This approach not only ensures the primordial status of the law,but also carries out dual transformation of technological and legal governance,and integrates technological logic with the rule of law thinking,providing a holistic solution for optimizing the relationship between technological and legal governance.Specifically,this can be achieved by exploring the commonalities in the underlying logic of technological and legal governance,constructing a unified operational mechanism,and realizing aligned power effects,thereby promoting the integrated evolution and optimized development of their relationship.

            HTML

          Relative (9)

          目录

          沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

          ICCAS
           Chinese Chemical Society

          Address： 邮政编码：200020

          Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

          Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return