法则与自由：康德定言命令公式的规范性阐释

卞绍斌

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

October 2018

Article Contents

Citation: Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 42-56. shu

Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives

Abstract

Varieties of Categorical Imperatives in the context of Kant’s practical philosophy represent the thought purport of human being as an end in itself from different perspectives, and freedom is the fundamental value premise and also the normative basis for justifying Categorical Imperatives. In order to preserve and promote this value purport, confirming the universal law by the capacity of pure practical reason (unfolding as the duties of morality as inner constraint and the duties of right as external coercion) is the necessary approach, then avoid the abuse of freedom and destroy itself, and prevent the command derived from self or other sensory inclinations. Confirming fundamental idea of freedom, cultivating and exercising moral disposition, and promoting moral personality, are all the significant ways for practicing and accomplishing Categorical Imperatives. Baesd on the normative perspective, we can not only make a coherent understanding on Kant’s works in different period, then eliminate the weakness of single metaphysical justification, but also answer the misunderstanding and criticism efficiently about Kant’s ethics
References
Access
1. [1]
  HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.
2. [2]
  YANG Rui . Five Planet Conjunctions: Reinterpretation of the Celestial Phenomenon in 1007. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 207-216.
3. [3]
  ZHANG Liuhua . How are the Norms of Human Reasoning Possible——Towards a Peircean Solution. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 20-31.
4. [4]
  WANG Xiaoyang . The Normative Dimension of Animal Consciousness——The Later Wittgenstein on Animal Minds and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 16-27.
5. [5]
  LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.
6. [6]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
7. [7]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
8. [8]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
9. [9]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
10. [10]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
11. [11]
  LIU Chuang , LIU Sijia . Conceptual Engineering: A Way of Understanding Mind and Intelligence in the Future. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 11-19.
12. [12]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
13. [13]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
14. [14]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
15. [15]
  LIU Xuguang . Aesthetic Reflective Pleasure: On the Characteristic and Component of Aesthetic Pleasure. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 194-204.
16. [16]
  LI Ming , XU Haiqi , XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.
17. [17]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
18. [18]
  ZHANG Han , ZHOU Xiaohong . The Confluence of a Thousand Lakes: “Huddling for Warmth” and Business Practices of Yiwu Peasants. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 119-134.
19. [19]
  LIANG Tao , XU Yuantong . Human Mind,the Way Mind and the Counsels of Great Yu——An Academic Inquiry Based on the Misplaced Slips in Xunzi. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 5-16.
20. [20]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 5552 Times PDF downloads: 27 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(27)
Abstract views(5552)
HTML views(698)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives

Abstract: Varieties of Categorical Imperatives in the context of Kant’s practical philosophy represent the thought purport of human being as an end in itself from different perspectives, and freedom is the fundamental value premise and also the normative basis for justifying Categorical Imperatives. In order to preserve and promote this value purport, confirming the universal law by the capacity of pure practical reason (unfolding as the duties of morality as inner constraint and the duties of right as external coercion) is the necessary approach, then avoid the abuse of freedom and destroy itself, and prevent the command derived from self or other sensory inclinations. Confirming fundamental idea of freedom, cultivating and exercising moral disposition, and promoting moral personality, are all the significant ways for practicing and accomplishing Categorical Imperatives. Baesd on the normative perspective, we can not only make a coherent understanding on Kant’s works in different period, then eliminate the weakness of single metaphysical justification, but also answer the misunderstanding and criticism efficiently about Kant’s ethics

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives

HTML

目录