Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 9
November 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Shuangli ZHANG. Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 15-27. shu

Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society

  • It is pointed out in this paper that the “Hegel-Marx Problem” is the key thread for us to study Marx’s theory of civil society. It mainly means the non-ethical or anti-ethical nature of civil society. Hegel is the one who has firstly analyzed the anti-ethical determination of civil society. He took this as the ultimate problem for modern societies. Under the new historical conditions, Marx has then deepened the connotation of this problem through two steps. Firstly, based on the concrete analysis of the relationship between the state and civil society, he arrived at the judgment that civil society has not any ethical functions at all and that its development is only of the anti-ethical tendencies. Then, through the critical analysis of the power relationship within the sphere of civil society, he developed a new version of the relationship between civil society and modern state within the theoretical paradigm of class domination. Based on this, he has transformed the concept of civil society (bürgerliche Gesellschaft) into the concept of modern bourgeois society. Connected with this, he has developed Hegel’s judgment about the anti-ethical determination of civil society into the judgment about the developmental tendency of modern bourgeois society. Marx argued clearly that the model of “capitalist economy + liberal politics” was necessarily unsustainable. It is also argued in the conclusion part of the paper that we could rethink the relevance of Marx’s theory of civil society from the perspective of this “Hegel-Marx Problem”.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

    2. [2]

      YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.

    3. [3]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    4. [4]

      SHI Dan ,  LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.

    5. [5]

      LIU Fengjie . “The Flower's Color Become Lucid Immediately”——The Aesthetic Implications and Modern Reverberations of Wang Yangming's “Mind-Thing Relationship”. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 180-193.

    6. [6]

      XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.

    7. [7]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

    8. [8]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    9. [9]

      YANG Dian ,  DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.

    10. [10]

      ZANG Leizhen ,  LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.

    11. [11]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    12. [12]

      HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.

    13. [13]

      MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.

    14. [14]

      WANG Jiajun ,  ZHENG Ningning . Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 158-169.

    15. [15]

      LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

    16. [16]

      HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3046 Times PDF downloads: 34 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(34)
  • Abstract views(3046)
  • HTML views(533)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society

        Abstract: It is pointed out in this paper that the “Hegel-Marx Problem” is the key thread for us to study Marx’s theory of civil society. It mainly means the non-ethical or anti-ethical nature of civil society. Hegel is the one who has firstly analyzed the anti-ethical determination of civil society. He took this as the ultimate problem for modern societies. Under the new historical conditions, Marx has then deepened the connotation of this problem through two steps. Firstly, based on the concrete analysis of the relationship between the state and civil society, he arrived at the judgment that civil society has not any ethical functions at all and that its development is only of the anti-ethical tendencies. Then, through the critical analysis of the power relationship within the sphere of civil society, he developed a new version of the relationship between civil society and modern state within the theoretical paradigm of class domination. Based on this, he has transformed the concept of civil society (bürgerliche Gesellschaft) into the concept of modern bourgeois society. Connected with this, he has developed Hegel’s judgment about the anti-ethical determination of civil society into the judgment about the developmental tendency of modern bourgeois society. Marx argued clearly that the model of “capitalist economy + liberal politics” was necessarily unsustainable. It is also argued in the conclusion part of the paper that we could rethink the relevance of Marx’s theory of civil society from the perspective of this “Hegel-Marx Problem”.

          HTML

        Relative (16)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return