Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 4
May 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Mingdong GU. The Lamp in the Mirror: Chinese and Western Mimeticism and Lyricism in Artistic Representation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 140-150. shu

The Lamp in the Mirror: Chinese and Western Mimeticism and Lyricism in Artistic Representation

  • In the study of classical aesthetic thought across cultures, there exists a view on the ontology and epistemology of artistic representation widely accepted in China and the West. It is an oppositional paradigm based on the contrast between Western mimesis and mimeticism and Chinese lyricism and expressionism. With further exposition, this view has been accepted by numerous scholars and exerted a strong impact upon the study of Chinese and Western literature and art. To what extent is this view reasonable? Is it an accurate reflection of the historical development of Chinese and Western traditions? Can it describe the ontological and epistemological differences in Chinese and Western artistic representation? What is the real condition of Chinese and Western mimesis and lyricism? This article selects two groups of thinkers who have expressed views on these questions: Laozi, Guanzi, Wei Hong, Cao Pi, Lu Ji, Liu Xie, Ye Xie, Li Zhi and others from the Chinese tradition, and Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Longinus, Schelling, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Dennis, Heidegger and others from the Western tradition in relation to the views of some modern philosophers, theorists, and scholars, with the aim to analyze their discourses of artistic representation and to find out to what extent the oppositional paradigm is true and valid and whether it is possible to locate a common ground for different theories of representation. On the basis of a close reading of some influential discourses of artistic representation, this article proposes “lamp in the mirror” as a concept that fuses binary dichotomies and hopes to gain some insights for the construction of global aesthetics.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

    2. [2]

      SU Tao . The Variations of Lyricism: On Cinematic Adaptations of Shen Congwen's Works in the 1950s. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 185-193.

    3. [3]

      LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.

    4. [4]

      WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.

    5. [5]

      FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.

    6. [6]

      LIU Fengjie . “The Flower's Color Become Lucid Immediately”——The Aesthetic Implications and Modern Reverberations of Wang Yangming's “Mind-Thing Relationship”. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 180-193.

    7. [7]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    8. [8]

      WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

    9. [9]

      WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.

    10. [10]

      RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

    11. [11]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    12. [12]

      WANG Xiaoyang . The Normative Dimension of Animal Consciousness——The Later Wittgenstein on Animal Minds and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 16-27.

    13. [13]

      YANG Dian ,  DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.

    14. [14]

      LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.

    15. [15]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3460 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(10)
  • Abstract views(3460)
  • HTML views(619)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        The Lamp in the Mirror: Chinese and Western Mimeticism and Lyricism in Artistic Representation

        Abstract: In the study of classical aesthetic thought across cultures, there exists a view on the ontology and epistemology of artistic representation widely accepted in China and the West. It is an oppositional paradigm based on the contrast between Western mimesis and mimeticism and Chinese lyricism and expressionism. With further exposition, this view has been accepted by numerous scholars and exerted a strong impact upon the study of Chinese and Western literature and art. To what extent is this view reasonable? Is it an accurate reflection of the historical development of Chinese and Western traditions? Can it describe the ontological and epistemological differences in Chinese and Western artistic representation? What is the real condition of Chinese and Western mimesis and lyricism? This article selects two groups of thinkers who have expressed views on these questions: Laozi, Guanzi, Wei Hong, Cao Pi, Lu Ji, Liu Xie, Ye Xie, Li Zhi and others from the Chinese tradition, and Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Longinus, Schelling, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Dennis, Heidegger and others from the Western tradition in relation to the views of some modern philosophers, theorists, and scholars, with the aim to analyze their discourses of artistic representation and to find out to what extent the oppositional paradigm is true and valid and whether it is possible to locate a common ground for different theories of representation. On the basis of a close reading of some influential discourses of artistic representation, this article proposes “lamp in the mirror” as a concept that fuses binary dichotomies and hopes to gain some insights for the construction of global aesthetics.

          HTML

        Relative (15)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return