国家治理的技术框架：从管理工程到社会工程的空间重塑

罗梁波

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

December 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Liangbo LUO. The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 102-117. shu

The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering

Liangbo LUO

Abstract

Space is not only the field of technology, but also the functional boundary of technology. The technical logic of national governance practice is reflected in the complex ecology of the interaction pattern of administration and politics and society, technology and value and form. There is a structural deviation in public management’s cognition of technological space. Technological narrative cannot be confined to the perspective of management tools, nor can it go beyond the development limit and objective conditions of time and space. The external technological scene of national governance is not only the management efficiency, but also the ability to integrate the state and society into the community to use tools and allocate resources. The internal technical scene of national governance is not only the management project, but also the allocation of administrative resources as a management practice. As a political practice technology is the way to realize value. As an institutional practice, technology is the foundation and practical way of form construction. Public management needs to objectively and comprehensively understand the technical space, treat the development of technology empirically, understand the essence of technology from administrative production, and reconstruct the technical scene of national governance with social engineering instead of management engineering.
- national governance structure,
- technical rationality,
- technology extension space,
- administration, politics and society
References
Access
1. [1]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
2. [2]
  XIE Yue . How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 106-117.
3. [3]
  HE Da'an , LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.
4. [4]
  DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.
5. [5]
  MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.
6. [6]
  XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.
7. [7]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
8. [8]
  WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.
9. [9]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.
10. [10]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
11. [11]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.
12. [12]
  WANG Jiajun , ZHENG Ningning . Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 158-169.
13. [13]
  XIONG Changkun , ZHANG Ziyuan . Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 198-210.
14. [14]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
15. [15]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
16. [16]
  ZANG Leizhen , LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.
17. [17]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

Figures(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 5345 Times PDF downloads: 18 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(18)
Abstract views(5345)
HTML views(478)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering

Liangbo LUO

Available Online: 2021-10-20

Abstract: Space is not only the field of technology, but also the functional boundary of technology. The technical logic of national governance practice is reflected in the complex ecology of the interaction pattern of administration and politics and society, technology and value and form. There is a structural deviation in public management’s cognition of technological space. Technological narrative cannot be confined to the perspective of management tools, nor can it go beyond the development limit and objective conditions of time and space. The external technological scene of national governance is not only the management efficiency, but also the ability to integrate the state and society into the community to use tools and allocate resources. The internal technical scene of national governance is not only the management project, but also the allocation of administrative resources as a management practice. As a political practice technology is the way to realize value. As an institutional practice, technology is the foundation and practical way of form construction. Public management needs to objectively and comprehensively understand the technical space, treat the development of technology empirically, understand the essence of technology from administrative production, and reconstruct the technical scene of national governance with social engineering instead of management engineering.