Citation:
Puqu WANG and Bin TANG. The Three Dimensions of Production Mechanism of National Governance Capacity[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 65-72, 120.
The Three Dimensions of Production Mechanism of National Governance Capacity
-
Abstract
The main defect of the existing theory of national governance capability is that it does not clarify the specific differences among its concepts, sources and mechanisms, so it is essentially a static research perspective. This article attempts to use the academic resources of " nationalism” and " new nationalism” in the field of comparative politics to examine the national governance ability in the dynamic process of the national implementation of the goals. This paper holds that the national governance capacity, as a unique " potential” of the country, does not function naturally, and there are complicated production links and production mechanisms between dormant state and explicit release. In essence, they can be reduced to " organizational resources”, " value resources” and " material resources”. Under the combination and effect of the corresponding processing mechanisms, namely, the aggregation mechanism of the national structure, the legalization mechanism of the national action and the extension mechanism of the national organization, the three materials can be transformed into the explicit process of actual implementation efficiency. These resource elements, mechanisms and national governance capacity also constitute a clear relationship function.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[2]
HE Da'an
, LI Huaizheng
. Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 54-63.
-
[3]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[4]
XIN Fangkun
. Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 91-101.
-
[5]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[6]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[7]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(2): 210-216.
-
[8]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[9]
XIONG Changkun
, ZHANG Ziyuan
. Multi-party Game and Informal Governance in Central-Local Fiscal Relations——Focusing on the Yinhao Reform of Guangdong Salt Tax in the Early Republic of China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 198-210.
-
[10]
LI Yushuan
. New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 170-180.
-
[11]
FENG Yurong
. “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 180-190.
-
[12]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[13]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-