论古希腊罗马善恶观的生成与理论建构

王晓朝

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

December 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Xiaochao WANG. On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 5-12. shu

On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome

Xiaochao WANG

Abstract

Tracing to source is the main method of moral genesis. This paper uses the tracing method to investigate the origin of the ancient Greek and Roman concept of perceptual good and evil. The first part points out that the Greeks in Homer’s time had formed a moral judgment mode with the concept of good and evil as the basic tool, and had their own perceptual view of good and evil through the trace of language and history. The poets Homer and Hesiod concretized these two moral concepts, put forward moral judgment and evaluation for many behaviors, and then put forward moral precepts, so that their works played the role of moral education. The second part points out that the birth of rational thinking has facilitated the development of Greek ethical thought through the investigation of the good and evil views of Greek philosophers in the early and classical periods. Philosophers of all ages have been rational processing of the perceptual view of good and evil of Homer and Hesiod, on the basis of which the rational view of good and evil with different theoretical forms has been developed. The third part points out that the rational view of good and evil continued to expand and inherit in the Hellenistic period and the Roman Empire period and formed the rational view of good and evil with different contents and structures.
- moral sense,
- good and evil view,
- moral judgment,
- good and evil theory,
- theoretical construction
References
Access
1. [1]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
2. [2]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
3. [3]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
4. [4]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
5. [5]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
6. [6]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
7. [7]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
8. [8]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.
9. [9]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.
10. [10]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
11. [11]
  FENG Yurong . “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 180-190.
12. [12]
  GE Yonghai , PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.
13. [13]
  SHI Dan , LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.
14. [14]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.
15. [15]
  WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.
16. [16]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
17. [17]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
18. [18]
  WANG Xiaoyang . The Normative Dimension of Animal Consciousness——The Later Wittgenstein on Animal Minds and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 16-27.
19. [19]
  LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.
20. [20]
  HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 4129 Times PDF downloads: 13 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(13)
Abstract views(4129)
HTML views(1004)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome

Xiaochao WANG

Available Online: 2020-11-20

Abstract: Tracing to source is the main method of moral genesis. This paper uses the tracing method to investigate the origin of the ancient Greek and Roman concept of perceptual good and evil. The first part points out that the Greeks in Homer’s time had formed a moral judgment mode with the concept of good and evil as the basic tool, and had their own perceptual view of good and evil through the trace of language and history. The poets Homer and Hesiod concretized these two moral concepts, put forward moral judgment and evaluation for many behaviors, and then put forward moral precepts, so that their works played the role of moral education. The second part points out that the birth of rational thinking has facilitated the development of Greek ethical thought through the investigation of the good and evil views of Greek philosophers in the early and classical periods. Philosophers of all ages have been rational processing of the perceptual view of good and evil of Homer and Hesiod, on the basis of which the rational view of good and evil with different theoretical forms has been developed. The third part points out that the rational view of good and evil continued to expand and inherit in the Hellenistic period and the Roman Empire period and formed the rational view of good and evil with different contents and structures.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome

HTML

目录