Citation:
Mingjun ZHANG. Instrumental Rationality and the Form of Liberal Political Romanticism[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 85-95.
Instrumental Rationality and the Form of Liberal Political Romanticism
-
Abstract
As a paradigm of multiple rationality, instrumental rationality means to achieve the maximization of efficiency or utility through rigorous logical thinking and precise scientific calculations. Liberal political romanticism strives to ensure the realization of citizens’ individual democracy and freedom rights through the transplantation, design, construction and perfection of the system. Andthe institutional rationality in instrumental rationality plays an important role in the process of the formation of liberal political romanticism. Specifically, theargument basis of instrumental rationality leads the value direction of liberal political romanticism, the institutional concern of instrumental rationality establishes the hopes and the preferences of liberal political romanticism, and the thinking characteristics of instrumental rationality shape the cognitive logic of liberal political romanticism, moreover,the core proposition of instrumental rationality promotes the behavioral model of liberal political romanticism.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
WANG Qian
. AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 118-132.
-
[2]
XIE Yue
. How State Capacity Is Generated in Practice——A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Governance. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 106-117.
-
[3]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[4]
LI Xiuyun
, LI Yue
. Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 206-216.
-
[5]
LIN Qiuyun
, QIU Haixiang
. Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(2): 165-182.
-
[6]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(2): 210-216.
-
[7]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[8]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[9]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: