Citation:
WANG Shizhong. A Critique of Smith's Argumentation Schemes for Commercial Society[J]. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(11): 20-32.
A Critique of Smith's Argumentation Schemes for Commercial Society
-
Abstract
Mandeville affirmed the positive significance of modern commercial society through the paradoxical proposition of “private vices, public benefits”. Rousseau, starting from the “state of nature”, negated the civilizational value of modern commercial society. In contrast, Smith justified commercial society by linking the “path to wealth” to the “path to virtue”. The German Historical School later misinterpreted Smith's argumentation schemes as the “Adam Smith Problem”, which in turn provoked critiques from the Austrian School of Economics and a counter-reaction under the slogan “Back to Smith”. Revisiting the theoretical background, philosophical foundations, and historical repercussions of Smith's argumentation schemes along the voluntarist path after the Nominalist revolution, we can achieve a new perspective. This re-examination allows us to transcend not only the opposition between Mandeville and Rousseau but also the divergence between the German Historical School and the Austrian School. This re-examination clarifies Smith's foundational status as the “Newton of the economic field”. The question of universality versus particularity in Smith's argumentation schemes is a basic issue for any science. It deserves serious consideration as a prerequisite question for adapting Marxism to the Chinese context and constructing China's independent knowledge system.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[2]
ZANG Leizhen
, LI Wei
. Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 84-93.
-
[3]
ZHANG Han
, ZHOU Xiaohong
. The Confluence of a Thousand Lakes: “Huddling for Warmth” and Business Practices of Yiwu Peasants. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 119-134.
-
[4]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[5]
WANG Jiajun
, ZHENG Ningning
. Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 158-169.
-
[6]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[7]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[8]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[9]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[10]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
[11]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[12]
DING Huiping
. Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 143-154.
-
[13]
MA Xuejun
. The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 132-142.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: