理解全球化：基于“经济−社会−政治”体系共生演化视角的分析

葛劲峰; 袁志刚; 樊潇彦

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Jinfeng GE, Zhigang YUAN and Xiaoyan FAN. Understanding Globalization: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Co-evolution of Economic-Social-Political System[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 31-44. shu

Understanding Globalization: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Co-evolution of Economic-Social-Political System

Abstract

Super globalization has swept the world since the 1980s. The world today is marked by changes unseen in a century, and globalization has fallen into a quagmire. How should we understand the current special plight of globalization? What is the characterization of changes unseen in a century? Based on the comprehensive perspectives of economics, political science, sociology and international relations, we construct a dynamic evolutionary framework integrating “economy-society-politics” to understand the deep-rooted contradictions of globalization in today’s world. We first review the evolution of global economic power and income distribution patterns during the recent wave of globalization, and presents a panoramic view of the beneficiaries and losers of globalization. In turn, we point out the evolution of the global economic foundation, that is, the changes in the global economic power structure and the deterioration of income distribution within globalization will transform the economic and social foundations, and then affect the superstructure: the country’s dominant thinking and ideology. The evolution of a country’s dominant thinking in the field of international relations and economic policies will inevitably affect its foreign strategy and policy formulation, which finally affects its own economic trend and even the historical process of globalization. At this point, we have completed a closed-loop analysis of “economy-society-politics” in which globalization affects the social and economic foundations, and then affects political ideology and policy formulation.
- globalization,
- economic-social-political system,
- international political economics
References
Access
1. [1]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
2. [2]
  ZHANG Jun , FANG Hongsheng . Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 70-90.
3. [3]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
4. [4]
  LI Xiuyun , LI Yue . Educational Discipline and Political Construction: The Shaping of Sun Yat-sen's Textbook Media Image in His Youth. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 206-216.
5. [5]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
6. [6]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 210-216.
7. [7]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.
8. [8]
  SHI Dan , LI Peng . The Least-Cost Path for Energy Use in the Process of Modernization——Scenario Analysis and Theoretical Examination. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 45-58.
9. [9]
  ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.
10. [10]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
11. [11]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
12. [12]
  ZANG Leizhen , LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.
13. [13]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
14. [14]
  DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.
15. [15]
  MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.

Figures(15) / Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 9922 Times PDF downloads: 16 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(16)
Abstract views(9922)
HTML views(580)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Understanding Globalization: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Co-evolution of Economic-Social-Political System

Available Online: 2021-08-20

Abstract: Super globalization has swept the world since the 1980s. The world today is marked by changes unseen in a century, and globalization has fallen into a quagmire. How should we understand the current special plight of globalization? What is the characterization of changes unseen in a century? Based on the comprehensive perspectives of economics, political science, sociology and international relations, we construct a dynamic evolutionary framework integrating “economy-society-politics” to understand the deep-rooted contradictions of globalization in today’s world. We first review the evolution of global economic power and income distribution patterns during the recent wave of globalization, and presents a panoramic view of the beneficiaries and losers of globalization. In turn, we point out the evolution of the global economic foundation, that is, the changes in the global economic power structure and the deterioration of income distribution within globalization will transform the economic and social foundations, and then affect the superstructure: the country’s dominant thinking and ideology. The evolution of a country’s dominant thinking in the field of international relations and economic policies will inevitably affect its foreign strategy and policy formulation, which finally affects its own economic trend and even the historical process of globalization. At this point, we have completed a closed-loop analysis of “economy-society-politics” in which globalization affects the social and economic foundations, and then affects political ideology and policy formulation.