Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY，Today is

Chinese
Volume 51 Issue 9
October 2019
Article Contents

    Citation: Jiming CAI, Minsi ZHENG and Mengxing LIU. The Criteria for Judging Whether China Economic and Social Development Plans are Scientific and Reasonable[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 46-56. shu

    The Criteria for Judging Whether China Economic and Social Development Plans are Scientific and Reasonable

    • Abstract

      Judging China’s econmic and social development planning includes seven criteria: whether it embodies human-oriented scientific concept of development, whether it meets the basic situation of our country, whether it gives preference to public interest, whether the market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources, whether it aims at providing public goods for externalities (market failure), whether it has established an incentive compatibility mechanism between central government and local government and between government and civil society, whether it sets the discretion of local governments in a reasonable range. They are not only the criteria for judging whether various economic and social development plans including the “Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development” are scientific and reasonable, but also the basic principles for formulating new economic and social development plans in the future, especially the “Fourteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development” which has already been launched.
    • 加载中

    • References

    • Access

      1. [1]

        YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

      2. [2]

        YANG Lan ,  ZHOU Yahong ,  XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.

      3. [3]

        LI Ming ,  XU Haiqi ,  XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.

      4. [4]

        ZANG Leizhen ,  LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.

      5. [5]

        ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.

      6. [6]

        LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

      7. [7]

        ZHAO Lin ,  ZHANG Boyu ,  LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.

      8. [8]

        HU Yiqing ,  MA Zhihao ,  ZONG Yixiang . A Decade Review and Evaluation of the Development in the Discipline of Journalism and Communication (2009—2018)——Analysis Based on the Comprehensive Index of Humanities and Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 206-216.

    Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Entire Issue PDF

    Article Metrics

    Article views: 5638 Times PDF downloads: 11 Times Cited by: 0 Times

    Metrics
    • PDF Downloads(11)
    • Abstract views(5638)
    • HTML views(414)
    • Latest
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
            通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
            • 1. 

              沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

            1. 本站搜索
            2. 百度学术搜索
            3. 万方数据库搜索
            4. CNKI搜索

            The Criteria for Judging Whether China Economic and Social Development Plans are Scientific and Reasonable

            • Available Online: 2019-09-01

            Abstract: Judging China’s econmic and social development planning includes seven criteria: whether it embodies human-oriented scientific concept of development, whether it meets the basic situation of our country, whether it gives preference to public interest, whether the market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources, whether it aims at providing public goods for externalities (market failure), whether it has established an incentive compatibility mechanism between central government and local government and between government and civil society, whether it sets the discretion of local governments in a reasonable range. They are not only the criteria for judging whether various economic and social development plans including the “Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development” are scientific and reasonable, but also the basic principles for formulating new economic and social development plans in the future, especially the “Fourteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development” which has already been launched.

              HTML

            Table (2) Relative (8)

            目录

            沪ICP备16024018号-1  沪公网安备 31010102003103号

            ICCAS
             Chinese Chemical Society

            Address： 邮政编码：200020

            Telephone：021－53060399、53069080 Email：xsyk021@163.com

            Supported by Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd Technical ： info@rhhz.net

            /

            DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
            Return