政治经济学批判语境中的社会性概念重构

孙亮

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Liang SUN. Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 14-21. shu

Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy

Liang SUN

Abstract

To frame Marx in the name of “ sociology” , we need to understand the “ revolution” between Marx and Western sociology. The lack of in-depth attention to “ sociality” , which is the construction principle of “interpersonal relationship”, hinders our understanding of the essence of “revolution” between them, and thus misleads the construction of Marxian social theory. Taking Hobbes and Hegel as examples, we can see their model of “sociality I” with the characteristics of external coercive structure, while the latter provides a scheme for modernity reconstruction more straightforwardly at the level of “sociality II” in the internal dimension. These two have also become the basic ideas of Western sociology when facing this problem. When people approach from the perspective of critique of political economy, it can be seen that Marx points to “sociality III”, and he demands to focus on the internal relationship between capitalist social relations and human actions, so as to seek the change of human existence mode from the logic of interaction between class and capital, which also shows an insurmountable gap between Marx and Western social theories.
- Marx,
- sociality,
- human actions
References
Access
1. [1]
  DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.
2. [2]
  LI Ming , XU Haiqi , XU Changtuo . A Statistical Framework and Measurement Results for Public Finance Investing in People. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 91-105.
3. [3]
  HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.
4. [4]
  WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.
5. [5]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
6. [6]
  YANG Dian , DONG Shuhao . The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 131-146.
7. [7]
  ZANG Leizhen , LI Wei . Bringing Context Back in——The Root Metaphor of the “Bringing Back” Approach in Social Science Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 84-93.
8. [8]
  YANG Lan , ZHOU Yahong , XIAO Xinyue . Digital Infrastructure, Relative Deprivation of Household Income, and Inclusive Development. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 71-83.
9. [9]
  ZHOU Mujun . Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 157-170.
10. [10]
  MA Xuejun . The Echoes of Yan Fu's Thought among Republican-Era Sociologists——Based on the Writings of Tao Menghe,Pan Guangdan,Lin Yaohua,and Fei Xiaotong. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 132-142.
11. [11]
  WANG Jiajun , ZHENG Ningning . Breathing: Rethinking a Poetic Concept through Levinas and Celan——Based on the Thought of Levinas and Celan. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(6): 158-169.
12. [12]
  GAO Jianping . Philosophical Reflections on Beauty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 170-179.
13. [13]
  XU Xiangdong . Consciousness and The Moral Status of AI Agents. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 5-15.
14. [14]
  XIN Fangkun . Agile Governance for Grassroots Cross-boundary Challenges. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 91-101.
15. [15]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
16. [16]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
17. [17]
  MA Chunhua , ZHANG Jingyi . “Science Fiction Yearns for Gender” : Death Ray on a Coral Island and Its Adaptations in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 176-184.
18. [18]
  LIN Qiuyun , QIU Haixiang . Left-Wing Cultural Dissemination in the Political Interstics of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression——— Take the Staging of Chongqing in the Fog as Example. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(2): 165-182.
19. [19]
  LIU Xuguang . Aesthetic Reflective Pleasure: On the Characteristic and Component of Aesthetic Pleasure. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 194-204.
20. [20]
  ZHANG Liuhua . How are the Norms of Human Reasoning Possible——Towards a Peircean Solution. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 20-31.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 2041 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(0)
Abstract views(2041)
HTML views(252)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy

Liang SUN

Available Online: 2022-04-20

Abstract: To frame Marx in the name of “ sociology” , we need to understand the “ revolution” between Marx and Western sociology. The lack of in-depth attention to “ sociality” , which is the construction principle of “interpersonal relationship”, hinders our understanding of the essence of “revolution” between them, and thus misleads the construction of Marxian social theory. Taking Hobbes and Hegel as examples, we can see their model of “sociality I” with the characteristics of external coercive structure, while the latter provides a scheme for modernity reconstruction more straightforwardly at the level of “sociality II” in the internal dimension. These two have also become the basic ideas of Western sociology when facing this problem. When people approach from the perspective of critique of political economy, it can be seen that Marx points to “sociality III”, and he demands to focus on the internal relationship between capitalist social relations and human actions, so as to seek the change of human existence mode from the logic of interaction between class and capital, which also shows an insurmountable gap between Marx and Western social theories.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy

HTML

目录