Citation:
Liang SUN. Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 14-21.
Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy
-
Abstract
To frame Marx in the name of “ sociology” , we need to understand the “ revolution” between Marx and Western sociology. The lack of in-depth attention to “ sociality” , which is the construction principle of “interpersonal relationship”, hinders our understanding of the essence of “revolution” between them, and thus misleads the construction of Marxian social theory. Taking Hobbes and Hegel as examples, we can see their model of “sociality I” with the characteristics of external coercive structure, while the latter provides a scheme for modernity reconstruction more straightforwardly at the level of “sociality II” in the internal dimension. These two have also become the basic ideas of Western sociology when facing this problem. When people approach from the perspective of critique of political economy, it can be seen that Marx points to “sociality III”, and he demands to focus on the internal relationship between capitalist social relations and human actions, so as to seek the change of human existence mode from the logic of interaction between class and capital, which also shows an insurmountable gap between Marx and Western social theories.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
YU Jianxing
, LIU Yuxuan
. Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 77-89.
-
[2]
ZHAO Lin
, ZHANG Boyu
, LIANG Hua
. The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 64-76.
-
[3]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[4]
CHEN Yinchi
, WU Siqi
. Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 157-169.
-
[5]
LI Yushuan
. New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 170-180.
-
[6]
LI Ting
. From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 143-156.
-
[7]
YING Qi
. Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 23-31.
-
[8]
QIN Zhongliang
. Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 181-194.
-
[9]
SHEN Yifei
. Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 129-142.
-
[10]
SUO Liming
, WEI He'ning
. Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 90-103.
-
[11]
WANG Gang
. Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 206-216.
-
[12]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[13]
LIAO Han
. Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 195-205.
-
[14]
HE Da'an
, LI Huaizheng
. Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 54-63.
-
[15]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[16]
WAN Yong
, LI Yalan
. Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 104-116.
-
[17]
LIU Wei
. Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 41-53.
-
-