Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 58 Issue 3
March 2026
Article Contents

Citation: HE Lei. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense[J]. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40. shu

What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense

  • According to the standard narrative of Kant's transcendental idealism,neither the metaphysical "two-world" interpretation nor the methodological/epistemological "dual-aspect" interpretation is sufficient to fully justify Kant's doctrine of the thing-in-itself.Within Kant's theoretical philosophy,the relationship between the negative thing in itself and the positive thing-in-itself constitutes exactly the "problem of the thing-in-itself" that the critical philosophy itself should address.The metaphor of "reading" in the Critique of Pure Reason illustrates both how the negative thing-in-itself serves as the unreadable ground of readable experience and how the problem of the thing-in-itself relates to a yet-to-bejustified second perspective:that which is already "read as" appearance within the theoretical and cognitive perspective ought to have its "meaning beyond the words" understood in a second perspective.Mou Zongsan's assertion that the thing-in-itself is a concept of value rather than a concept of fact correctly points out that the concept of the thing-initself must ultimately be connected to Kant's practical philosophy,yet fails to properly understand Kant's problem of the thing-in-itself.Li Minghui's defense of Mou Zongsan's position,due to its failure to thoroughly implement a perspectivist approach,also misses the accurate articulation of the problem of the thing-in-itself.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

    2. [2]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    3. [3]

      YU Jianxing ,  LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.

    4. [4]

      LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.

    5. [5]

      LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.

    6. [6]

      RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.

    7. [7]

      WAN Yong ,  LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.

    8. [8]

      WANG Qian . AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 118-132.

    9. [9]

      WEN Jun . From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 145-156.

Article Metrics

Article views: 3426 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(3426)
  • HTML views(106)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense

        Abstract: According to the standard narrative of Kant's transcendental idealism,neither the metaphysical "two-world" interpretation nor the methodological/epistemological "dual-aspect" interpretation is sufficient to fully justify Kant's doctrine of the thing-in-itself.Within Kant's theoretical philosophy,the relationship between the negative thing in itself and the positive thing-in-itself constitutes exactly the "problem of the thing-in-itself" that the critical philosophy itself should address.The metaphor of "reading" in the Critique of Pure Reason illustrates both how the negative thing-in-itself serves as the unreadable ground of readable experience and how the problem of the thing-in-itself relates to a yet-to-bejustified second perspective:that which is already "read as" appearance within the theoretical and cognitive perspective ought to have its "meaning beyond the words" understood in a second perspective.Mou Zongsan's assertion that the thing-in-itself is a concept of value rather than a concept of fact correctly points out that the concept of the thing-initself must ultimately be connected to Kant's practical philosophy,yet fails to properly understand Kant's problem of the thing-in-itself.Li Minghui's defense of Mou Zongsan's position,due to its failure to thoroughly implement a perspectivist approach,also misses the accurate articulation of the problem of the thing-in-itself.

          HTML

        Relative (9)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return