国际关系学中的中国学派构建 （笔谈）

任 晓，季玲，彭成义，鲁鹏

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

June 2024

Article Contents

Citation: REN Xiao，JI Ling，PENG Chengyi，LU Peng. The Construction of the Chinese School of International Relations (conversation by writing)[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(5): 70-97. shu

The Construction of the Chinese School of International Relations (conversation by writing)

REN Xiao，JI Ling，PENG Chengyi，LU Peng

Abstract

Ren Xiao combs through the development history and controversy process of symbiosis theory in China, and believes that it has common core concepts, academic interests, and shows the growth of academic schools. Meanwhile, symbiosis theory has also attracted the attention of the international academic community. According to Ji Ling, relationalist research has shifted to an entityist way of thinking, and a new form of global international relations knowledge production with relationalist thinking has emerged. Entityist epistemology takes entities as the basic unit of analysis and looks for linear causality from the categories of dichotomies. Relationalist epistemology, on the other hand, transcends dichotomies through the development of various concepts and methods. The ‘middle ground’ and ‘dialectic’ in traditional Chinese culture provide important resources for global relational studies, which have become more diversified under the influence of different relationalist traditions. Based on the perspective of Kuhn's paradigm revolution, Peng Chengyi argues that the current Chinese international relations theory has entered a stage where conventional research and paradigm shift go hand in hand, and that there are not only the results of the mainstream theoretical paradigm research on western international relations, but also the exploration of the Chinese school of thought. Taking the ISA2023 Annual Conference as an example, Lu Peng introduces Western scholars' Chinese feedback on the school in terms of both the whole and specific branches: the former includes understanding the Chinese school as a whole in terms of its branches, and lacks a holistic grasp of the Chinese school's goals, feasibility, and other elements; the latter, on the basis of its affirmation of the academic contributions of the theory of relations, is also critical of the inconsistency between its two self-positions and the mismatch between its description of the network of relations and its conception of the international order. The latter, while affirming the academic contributions of the theory of relations, also criticised the inconsistency between its two self-orientations and the mismatch between its description of the network of relations and its conception of international order. The Chinese school responded to these criticisms, making the conference an equal and constructive dialogue between the two sides.
References
Access
1. [1]
  ZHAO Lin , ZHANG Boyu , LIANG Hua . The Relationship Between Monopoly and Innovation in Information Product Markets——A Growth Network Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 64-76.
2. [2]
  WANG Gang . Viewing the Cultural Intent of the “Xueheng School” from Hu Xiansu's Teachers and Friends's Group. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 206-216.
3. [3]
  LI Ting . From The Reproductive Institution to the Fertility Transition in Contemporary China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 143-156.
4. [4]
  SHEN Yifei . Theoretical Genealogies of the Emotional Economy and the Chinese Context. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 129-142.
5. [5]
  LIN Shangli . China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 5-11.
6. [6]
  RAN Gaoran . The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 117-128.
7. [7]
  CHEN Yinchi , WU Siqi . Interaction and Integration between Buddhist and Daoist Hagiographies in Medieval China. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 157-169.
8. [8]
  LI Yushuan . New Changes and Causes of the Poetry Style of Monks in the Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 170-180.
9. [9]
  YING Qi . Hegel's Conception of Reconciliation and the Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 23-31.
10. [10]
  QIN Zhongliang . Historical Views and Historical Facts: The Evolution of Perceptions of Fanzhen since the Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 181-194.
11. [11]
  SUO Liming , WEI He'ning . Platform Transition: The Re-Evolution of Network Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 90-103.
12. [12]
  YU Jianxing , LIU Yuxuan . Beyond the Outside Observer: Repositioning the Social Sciences in the Era of Large Language Models. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 77-89.
13. [13]
  LIAO Han . Popular Religion and the Formation of Local Culture——Research on the Belief in Ge Xian'gong in Northeastern Jiangxi since the Song and Yuan Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 195-205.
14. [14]
  HE Da'an , LI Huaizheng . Digital Adjustment Mechanism in the Application of Artificial General Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 54-63.
15. [15]
  NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.
16. [16]
  WAN Yong , LI Yalan . Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 104-116.
17. [17]
  LIU Wei . Several Important Theoretical Issues Needing Further Clarification for the Growth and Expansion of the Private Economy. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 41-53.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 3188 Times PDF downloads: 6 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(6)
Abstract views(3188)
HTML views(682)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Construction of the Chinese School of International Relations (conversation by writing)

REN Xiao，JI Ling，PENG Chengyi，LU Peng

Abstract: Ren Xiao combs through the development history and controversy process of symbiosis theory in China, and believes that it has common core concepts, academic interests, and shows the growth of academic schools. Meanwhile, symbiosis theory has also attracted the attention of the international academic community. According to Ji Ling, relationalist research has shifted to an entityist way of thinking, and a new form of global international relations knowledge production with relationalist thinking has emerged. Entityist epistemology takes entities as the basic unit of analysis and looks for linear causality from the categories of dichotomies. Relationalist epistemology, on the other hand, transcends dichotomies through the development of various concepts and methods. The ‘middle ground’ and ‘dialectic’ in traditional Chinese culture provide important resources for global relational studies, which have become more diversified under the influence of different relationalist traditions. Based on the perspective of Kuhn's paradigm revolution, Peng Chengyi argues that the current Chinese international relations theory has entered a stage where conventional research and paradigm shift go hand in hand, and that there are not only the results of the mainstream theoretical paradigm research on western international relations, but also the exploration of the Chinese school of thought. Taking the ISA2023 Annual Conference as an example, Lu Peng introduces Western scholars' Chinese feedback on the school in terms of both the whole and specific branches: the former includes understanding the Chinese school as a whole in terms of its branches, and lacks a holistic grasp of the Chinese school's goals, feasibility, and other elements; the latter, on the basis of its affirmation of the academic contributions of the theory of relations, is also critical of the inconsistency between its two self-positions and the mismatch between its description of the network of relations and its conception of the international order. The latter, while affirming the academic contributions of the theory of relations, also criticised the inconsistency between its two self-orientations and the mismatch between its description of the network of relations and its conception of international order. The Chinese school responded to these criticisms, making the conference an equal and constructive dialogue between the two sides.

HTML

Relative (17)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The Construction of the Chinese School of International Relations (conversation by writing)

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The Construction of the Chinese School of International Relations (conversation by writing)

HTML

目录