Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 11
November 2023
Article Contents

Citation: NAN Fan. Literary Criticism: Aestheticism and Its Historical Horizon[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 136-145. shu

Literary Criticism: Aestheticism and Its Historical Horizon

  • Many critics call for a return of aesthetics in literary criticism.“What is aesthetics” has not been fully resolved and cannot have a unified standard.Literary criticism must examine both the composition of literary works and why this composition produces strong aesthetic pleasure.The social-historical school of criticism introduces the concept of “history” to participate in the interpretation of aesthetics,emphasizing the special nature of “history” as a continuous whole.The literary discourse restores the vivid face of the individual at close range is another kind of historical cognition.The problem that “typicality” tries to solve is the relationship between individual and universal.The postmodern context is dissolving the various theoretical conditions behind “typicality”.Fredric Jameson tries to re-propose “cognitive mapping” to save historical totality theory.Jacques Rancière’s attention has long been focused on the category of “sensible”,emphasizing the impact of aesthetics on the established rules of “distribution of the sensible”.However,the reorganization function of “distribution of the sensible” is much weaker than criticism.Aesthetics can only act as seeds of future life,making dialogues actively with various life concepts.The aestheticism of literary criticism promotes the continuous expansion and deepening of these dialogues.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      ZHANG Yi . Cognitive Transformation in Historical Research in the Age of AI——“Fluency-Induced Occlusion” in LLM-Assisted Reading of Diplomatic Manuscripts. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 29-40.

    2. [2]

      NI Liangkang . The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(7): 12-22.

    3. [3]

      LIU Xuguang . Aesthetic Reflective Pleasure: On the Characteristic and Component of Aesthetic Pleasure. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 194-204.

    4. [4]

      LEI Lei . Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(1): 108-119.

    5. [5]

      HU Jun . Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 184-194.

    6. [6]

      GE Yonghai ,  PAN Juqiang . Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(5): 159-173.

    7. [7]

      DING Huiping . Invisible Governance and the Rebuilding of Local Social Order: A Historical Sociology Analysis of Qi Biaojia's Famine Relief Action in Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 143-154.

    8. [8]

      HE Lei . What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(3): 31-40.

    9. [9]

      LU Mingjun . Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly, 2026, 58(8): 41-55.

Article Metrics

Article views: 2915 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(2915)
  • HTML views(541)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Literary Criticism: Aestheticism and Its Historical Horizon

        Abstract: Many critics call for a return of aesthetics in literary criticism.“What is aesthetics” has not been fully resolved and cannot have a unified standard.Literary criticism must examine both the composition of literary works and why this composition produces strong aesthetic pleasure.The social-historical school of criticism introduces the concept of “history” to participate in the interpretation of aesthetics,emphasizing the special nature of “history” as a continuous whole.The literary discourse restores the vivid face of the individual at close range is another kind of historical cognition.The problem that “typicality” tries to solve is the relationship between individual and universal.The postmodern context is dissolving the various theoretical conditions behind “typicality”.Fredric Jameson tries to re-propose “cognitive mapping” to save historical totality theory.Jacques Rancière’s attention has long been focused on the category of “sensible”,emphasizing the impact of aesthetics on the established rules of “distribution of the sensible”.However,the reorganization function of “distribution of the sensible” is much weaker than criticism.Aesthetics can only act as seeds of future life,making dialogues actively with various life concepts.The aestheticism of literary criticism promotes the continuous expansion and deepening of these dialogues.

          HTML

        Relative (9)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return