Citation:
Wei WANG and Yajun CHEN. Controversy over the Concept “Experience”between McDowell and Brandom[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 28-37.
Controversy over the Concept “Experience”between McDowell and Brandom
-
Abstract
Both McDowell and Brandom claim their own views on empiricism stem from Sellars’ London lectures. However, the former insists that the reformed concept " experience” plays an indispensible role of justification in epistemology, while the later argues that experience has only a causal role with the result that there is no need to introduce it into the picture of empirical knowledge. The London lectures do not mention the justificatory role of experience, and only include the argument of observation reports justifying the empirical knowledge expressed by their contents. Observation reports could be verbal utterances as well as the perceptual experiences which have both propositional and descriptive contents, they are essentially a certain thought occur to one in a certain context and manner. And, for this reason, experiences could play a role of justification. It could be argued, in this way, that the Brandon’s picture of empirical knowledge does not clash with the McDowell’s. Moreover, besides the forces of causality and justification, it could also be found in the three persons’ arguments the third force of building empirical knowledge, the historical force.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
WANG Qi
. From Individual Experience to “Inner Experience”——Focusing on Bog om Adler. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 32-40.
-
[2]
ZHOU Mujun
. Between Theory and Empirical Facts: Habermas and the Sociological Debate on the Public Sphere. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 157-170.
-
[3]
FENG Yurong
. “Illuminating Ancient Learning,Introducing New Knowledge”: Xin Yizong Bidu and the Shift in the Construction of Modern Traditional Chinese Medicine Knowledge. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 180-190.
-
[4]
GE Yonghai
, PAN Juqiang
. Why Regional Literary History in China Becomes a Discipline——Academic Origins,Historical Evolution,and Theoretical Construction. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 159-173.
-
[5]
ZHANG Yahui
, Xia Dao Cai Rang
. Mandala and Shambhala: An Anthropological Analysis of the Origin Myth for the Ches-pa Tribe. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 158-169.
-
[6]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[7]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[8]
HE Lei
. What Is Kant's “Problem of the Thing-in-Itself”——With a Concurrent Critique of Mou Zongsan's Assertion and Li Minghui's Defense. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 31-40.
-
[9]
LU Mingjun
. Simulacra, Pattern Recognition, and Computational Formalism——Reflections on the Application of AI in Artistic Practice and Art History Research. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 41-55.
-
-