Citation:
Bing ZHANG. The Problem of Chinese Philosophy’s Return[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 17-33.
The Problem of Chinese Philosophy’s Return
-
Abstract
In the most severe sense, the " problem of return” of Chinese philosophy mainly refers to the crisis of the loss of its own meaning within the signifying practice of Western philosophical discourse. Historically, the statement that Chinese philosophy has the flaw of Feng Youlan-Hegel’s insufficient expression, gave rise to the movement of Chinese philosophy’s categorization, which led to the problem of Foucault-Saidian over-expression, namely, the problem of discourse-determinism. Against this background, " the transcendent subject” established by Mou Zongsan with the method of NiJueTiZheng（ " 逆觉体证” ）can be viewed as a willingful resistance to the Western philosophical discourse, but the deficiency of Mou’s ontological interpretation based on the subjectivity makes his theory serve the Western philosophical discourse practice. With the help of the teachings of the phenomenological reduction and the lesson of Mou Zongsan’s ontology, it can be said that the radical return of Chinese philosophy depends on the manifestation of a kind of aesthetic. Such aesthetic elucidation shows, the root of Chinese philosophy lies in the tacit percieved-world in where body was embedded. In that sense, both Heideggerian Ekstasis/ standing forth and Mo’s standing up should be essentially a bodily standing forth. The ecstacy and recession of body, that is, the intertwined horizon, constituts the foundation of the standing-forth of subjectivity; at the same time, the Chiasm of language and the tacit world, indicated by the bodily ecstatic-recessive chiasm, also dispels the predicament of so-called Chinese philosophy’s insufficient expression.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(5): 211-216.
-
[2]
LIN Shangli
. China's Mission in Constructing Original Theories and Its Methodological Foundation. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 5-11.
-
[3]
WAN Yong
, LI Yalan
. Realizing the Function of Copyright Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 104-116.
-
[4]
WANG Qian
. AI-Generated Content and Copyright Liability: Paradoxes and Resolutions. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 118-132.
-
[5]
RAN Gaoran
. The Evolution and Game of Property Systems——On the Paradigm Choice for Data Property. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 117-128.
-
[6]
NI Liangkang
. The Philosophy of History of “New Idealism” after Hegel: Neo-Hegelianism. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(7): 12-22.
-
[7]
WANG Xiaoyang
. The Normative Dimension of Animal Consciousness——The Later Wittgenstein on Animal Minds and Its Contemporary Implications. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(6): 16-27.
-
[8]
YANG Dian
, DONG Shuhao
. The Social Construction of Economic Value——Evidence from Financial Markets, with a Discussion on Building a Valuation System with Chinese Characteristics. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 131-146.
-
[9]
LEI Lei
. Methodological Standpoint of Digital Jurisdiction: Functionalism, or Normativism?. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(1): 108-119.
-
[10]
WEN Jun
. From Technical Tokens to Social Tokens: the Ontological Construction of Token Sociology. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 145-156.
-
[11]
HU Jun
. Three Dimensions of Aesthetic Value from the Perspective of Neuroaesthetics——On the Essence of Beauty and Other Issues. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(8): 184-194.
-
[12]
SU Tao
. The Variations of Lyricism: On Cinematic Adaptations of Shen Congwen's Works in the 1950s. Academic Monthly,
2026, 58(3): 185-193.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: